From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 18:03:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A51106F072 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+ZN=a5fdc564@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3F88FC0A for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+ZN=a5fdc564@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C639D23E49B for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:03:51 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080903190351.389b5259@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080903143901.GA32027@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <57057966651240527470195062000340979511-Webmail2@me.com> <26682.8228872784$1220442858@news.gmane.org> <20080903135750.F2188@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080903151335.0454e929@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080903143901.GA32027@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Google Chrome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:03:56 -0000 On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500 David Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote: > > > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to > > me. > > What about this? > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/ That's for the binary. AFAIK the source is BSD licensed, with some third-party components under other open-source licences.