From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 13:59:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59E316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:59:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193443D53 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:59:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.27.46.32])0.04 <0IE200AJYEUPWLV1@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:59:14 -0600 (CST) Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58CDB2CE751; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:59:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:59:12 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" In-reply-to: <4247B6F7.8010508@att.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200503280559.12940.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <20050328044052.75667.qmail@web53909.mail.yahoo.com> <200503272151.29109.ringworm01@gmail.com> <4247B6F7.8010508@att.net> User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Subject: Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:59:14 -0000 On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, > > but > > > > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information > > on the various options. > > > > here is an example: > > > > # all-depends-list > > # - Show all directories which are > > dependencies # for this port. > > > > then > > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/ezm3/ > > make all-depends-list > > > > result: > > > > /usr/ports/converters/libiconv > > /usr/ports/devel/gettext > > /usr/ports/devel/gmake > > /usr/ports/devel/libtool15 > > > > -Mike > > Mike, > > That's great info, thank you. It really helps put this into > perspective. > > I did portmanager -sl and it identifies 7 candidates for deletion. > It identifies cvsup-without-gui and also identifies ezm3 upon which > it depends. Am I missing something here or shouldn't ezm3 not been > identified as a "leaf port"? > > Jay ezm3 is a build dependency most likely, meaning once cvsup-without-gui is built it no longer needs ezm3, runs fine without it. -Mike