Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:57:13 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> Cc: doc@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook Makefile book.sgml chapters.ent doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/nanobsd Makefile chapter.sgml Message-ID: <445EB389.50901@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <168248421.20060508023256@rulez.sk> References: <20060507144535.GB42180@gothmog.pc> <1545851395.20060507170205@rulez.sk> <20060507163758.GA51229@gothmog.pc> <20060508.083506.59684188.hrs@allbsd.org> <168248421.20060508023256@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9767DC0FE773BF0C83A36D5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Hiroki, >=20 > Monday, May 8, 2006, 1:35:06 AM, you answered: >=20 >> Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote >> in <20060507163758.GA51229@gothmog.pc>: >=20 > ke>> I would probably like seeing something like an ``Embedded FreeBSD'= ' > ke>> chapter in the Handbook, where all available options would be list= ed, > ke>> including NanoBSD, FreeSBIE, and the upcoming TinyBSD too. >=20 >> I think it is good for us to have a document for such variants of >> installation method, but I disagree with adding a chapter to Handbook= >> for them. This is because NanoBSD and so on are nothing but special >> methods of build/installation and IMHO they are beyond the scope >> of Handbook. >=20 > We have even more advanced topics in Handbook than NanoBSD is. See > next paragraph. Actually the thing I had in mind as I was reading this thread is that an "embedded FreeBSD" article could (and probably would) go further in depth than the average handbook section. *That* to me would be the advantage of having this stuff as an article. That said I'm not the guy writing any of this stuff up (at least not at this time). I'm glad that people are taking the time to write more documentation of what I think is a pretty cool feature, regardless of where it sits in the doc tree. Cheers, Bruce. --------------enig9767DC0FE773BF0C83A36D5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEXrOO2MoxcVugUsMRAuifAJ0YbDF4Y2TyArphmtNjJl7L4+dX2wCglxu3 l6tn76VdYjYWtCWtt18kgYY= =NBAE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9767DC0FE773BF0C83A36D5A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445EB389.50901>