Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:53:05 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r313330 - in head: contrib/netcat lib/libipsec sbin/ifconfig sbin/setkey share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/modules sys/modules/ipsec sys/modules/tcp/tcpmd5 sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet/tcp... Message-ID: <1e8b55ba-11d2-9563-be44-0e20f7f2f33d@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1702061730140.94512@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <201702060849.v168nwmf064277@repo.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1702061730140.94512@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06.02.2017 17:31, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >> Date: Mon Feb 6 08:49:57 2017 >> New Revision: 313330 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313330 >> >> Log: >> Merge projects/ipsec into head/. > > [snip] > > Great, thanks! > > Have you any plans to merge this into stable/11 to reduce diffs in network > stack code? It depends from the further users feedback. I wanted to do MFC after one or two months. But there are two things that are questionable. The date of stable/11 feature freeze is not known. And there is also some changes that can be considered as POLA violations. E.g. now SPIs are unique, and if user had manually configured SAs with the same SPI, the MFC will break this. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1e8b55ba-11d2-9563-be44-0e20f7f2f33d>