From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 4 7:36:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.mail.frost.net (orac.frost.net [212.240.253.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E19115153 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matthewf@orac.frost.net) Received: from matthewf by relay.mail.frost.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11C296-000BfL-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 15:35:56 +0100 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:35:56 +0100 From: Matthew Frost To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: BRIDGE and natd together on the same machine Message-ID: <19990804153556.A44572@orac.frost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been trying to use BRIDGE and natd together on the same machine on my network. Basically so that some machines have real IP addresses and some are on a 192.168.x.x network on the same cable which are natd to the outside world. The machine has 2 ed PCI interfaces and is running 3.2-STABLE. Bridging works fine alone (along with IPFW) Natd works fine alone. However, switch bridging on together with natdand it would appear that as soon as a packet gets bridged the machine completely freezes. I'm guessing from what I've read in bridge.c it's because the bridge code doesn't handle Divert packets? (I can run natd on another machine for now but it would be nice to have it on the single Bridge/Firewall machine.) Regards, Matthew -- Matthew Frost http://www.frost.org/ email: matthew@frost.org "My feet, my arms and my ears. And, your feet." dfax: +44 701 0709 666 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message