From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 15 08:32:39 2007
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0B916A403;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru)
Received: from mail.inse.ru (inse.ru [144.206.128.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B0B13C457;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (www.inse.ru [144.206.128.1])
	by mail.inse.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E126733C4C;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:32:37 +0400 (MSD)
Message-ID: <4621E496.8080208@inse.ru>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:38:46 +0400
From: Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <200704141626.l3EGQ17F010365@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4621739B.9090901@inse.ru>
	<20070415030607.GA55421@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070415030607.GA55421@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.org>,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:32:39 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:36:43AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
>   
>> By the way, is possible to do some dummy port that would represent
>> the kernel and/or base system to do things more automate?
>>     
>
> Let's just say it's a very complicated project and leave it at that.
>   
I understand that. Probably some one who is aware of all pitfalls will 
formulate
the task and will add it to the ideas list? It also may me good for the 
next SoC.

rik
> Kris
>