From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 25 19:30:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980CE37B for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-x235.google.com (mail-bk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB1D1CE0 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id my13so1965340bkb.26 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:30:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=umgmmgEjU3DENTQKxdbfQfYyNlBoCT1PaaHqd20QVnk=; b=YR3R3LSszN8bGrZXc/17KHSfK9SpMcYuvo4gvaWshceMVXGEV2gAu1rEWfXm8PE5am L135TnY5bDKLMl6Nkwlsz6CZo7F4WyeNpvpob+oa4kWdsBXc/dI5mDbhIK8IXYQpEzGn l+MyTdaUnvVBtd1OKW8oN4WypOi/FLC3O297w5Gtx5iVmiL3x4478QAnnSATa+NUktSI bJXUCtMKvfuZleZcRJgr4/YHHlS/xBqhZ2AZ+OjPgZRIJyyTT6WjLoWH82f3PQIPl/fN 8D7Hzze7iCBWK/9SdsjOeYNFkkO0QzwUW4hbe7lb9XD5a1o3Oj6g4ZFyT7xE+/1PMmvR PbCA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.197.203 with SMTP id el11mr14923570bkb.24.1390678207391; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.123.193 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:30:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk> References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:30:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10? From: Waitman Gobble To: Frank Leonhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:30:09 -0000 On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > > Was it dropped because it's part on BIND, and that's been dropped from the > base system (bad idea if you ask me, but no one did)? Well, as far as I can > tell, this move has left us having to use "host" instead, and that's part > of the BIND package too. > > AFAIK nslookup is part of bind, which was dropped from base and instead unbound. http://www.freebsdnews.net/2013/09/20/freebsd-10s-new-technologies-and-features/ -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA 510-830-7975