From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 00:40:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D3716A50F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dexter@ambidexter.com) Received: from tortoise.way.lv (7.lmuza.lv [195.13.151.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB543F95 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dexter@ambidexter.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tortoise.way.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B69A1FED5B for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:12:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from tortoise.way.lv ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tortoise [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28337-07 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:12:37 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [213.175.79.146]) by tortoise.way.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E231FED52 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:12:36 +0300 (EEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:13:26 +0300 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Dexter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at way.lv Subject: Can file-backed memory disks act like slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:40:58 -0000 Hello all, I trust this is a Seldom Asked Question... I am using file-backed memory disks (as in mdconfig -f) to prototype filesystems. root.img gets mounted first and usr.img, var.img and tmp.img get mounted below it and as such they are behaving as partitions. Is there any way to get a single memory disk to behave like a slice and itself be partitioned? That would give essentially: /dev/md0a or even /dev/md0s1a This would allow the four partition images to be combined into a single partitioned image. Yes, I have a legitimate use for this. :) Appreciated, Michael. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 00:54:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF9016A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:54:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137CD43D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:54:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694BB7D96; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: The WRS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050806205118.S40683@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050806120736.K37973@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050806123610.K38067@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: (Solved) SSH not working for particular user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:54:30 -0000 For the archives. Found the problem the rights for the .ssh directory were wrong. They need to be "700". Given that I used adduser to create that account I think umask or something else for the root user may be wrong or perhaps the adduser script. The other point worth mentioning for anyone having a simmilar problem (ie some IDs connect, but others don't) is a file /etc/login.access. Settings in that file may allow some users to connect, but not others. Obviously by the same token /etc/login.conf could also be an issue, but a less common one (ie the user has some type of time restriction). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 00:58:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC5116A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:58:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9592143D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:58:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1E1ZUI-0006Q5-MZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:58:02 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1AC1583D-DC24-46EC-B061-107F95F973D2@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD - Questions From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:58:02 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: jail question -- why can a user programatically see more than one IP address inside a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:58:04 -0000 I have some jails. On 5.3R i386 Some software (some C based, some java) for various reasons, like licensing, look at all the IP addresses/interfaces available in the running system. Inside the jail they return more than just the jails IP address. For example, FrontBase database (www.frontbase.com) sees the following inside the jail " Host name and IP and ethernet address information ================================================= Name of this host : db.shire.net IP address of this host : XXX.70.252.100 IP address : XXX.70.252.132 IP address : 192.168.2.2 IP address : 127.0.0.1 No ethernet interfaces configured WARNING: The IP address, XXX.70.252.100 for this host db.shire.net is not configured on any network device. " The main address shown, XXX.70.252.100 is the jail's IP. XXX.70.252.132 is the main address assigned to bge0 on the jail's host 192.168.2.2 is the main address assigned to bge1 on the jail's host 127.0.0.1 is the main address assigned to lo0 on the jail's host The other bunch of alias IPs assigned to bge0 do not show through. I was wondering why the jailed processes can see these addresses though they do not show in ifconfig for example and you cannot do anything with them... On a related note we have some java software that is trying to do multicast inside a jail to do the mDNS stuff for ZeroConf and it is getting confused for similar reasons it appears (still gathering details on this) thanks Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 01:13:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EDA16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF31443D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j771DASl004736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:13:16 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050806181203.06352720@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:13:56 -0700 To: Michael Dexter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Can file-backed memory disks act like slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:13:19 -0000 At 04:13 PM 8/6/2005, Michael Dexter wrote: >Hello all, > >I trust this is a Seldom Asked Question... > >I am using file-backed memory disks (as in mdconfig -f) to prototype >filesystems. > >root.img gets mounted first and usr.img, var.img and tmp.img get mounted >below it and as such they are behaving as partitions. > >Is there any way to get a single memory disk to behave like a slice and >itself be partitioned? That would give essentially: > >/dev/md0a >or even >/dev/md0s1a Yeah... test# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1k count=5m 5242880+0 records in 5242880+0 records out 5368709120 bytes transferred in 113.203280 secs (47425385 bytes/sec) test# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /usr/home/glenn/it/test -u 0 test# bsdlabel -r -w /dev/md0 test# bsdlabel -e /dev/md0 test# newfs /dev/md0a /dev/md0a: 244.1MB (500000 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 4 cylinder groups of 61.05MB, 3907 blks, 7872 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 160, 125184, 250208, 375232 test# newfs /dev/md0d /dev/md0d: 244.1MB (500000 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 4 cylinder groups of 61.05MB, 3907 blks, 7872 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 160, 125184, 250208, 375232 test# newfs /dev/md0e /dev/md0e: 4631.7MB (9485736 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 26 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 160, 376512, 752864, 1129216, 1505568, 1881920, 2258272, 2634624, 3010976, 3387328, 3763680, 4140032, 4516384, 4892736, 5269088, 5645440, 6021792, 6398144, 6774496, 7150848, 7527200, 7903552, 8279904, 8656256, 9032608, 9408960 -Glenn >This would allow the four partition images to be combined into a single >partitioned image. > >Yes, I have a legitimate use for this. :) > >Appreciated, > >Michael. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 01:36:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E62A16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:36:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.spam.me.senseless@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23404434F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:36:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.spam.me.senseless@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so797590wra for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=M/SWUnmOQsZxJu1Q5W8pChmCF/a5GjscuC9tmjnQM/o2Fbnj4m8pM53sqXI7Lm9z809zBnNffFEyiQANILv2hb8TKxGJf2R5GY9a9mqLZVBCzU5laVkzWAH383dE1cW2CvvOtTS/9Gw1qD5Av4SEe9twTjhPN/mvhIFRLhwNB6k= Received: by 10.54.53.63 with SMTP id b63mr3650113wra; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.34.24 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7093dffb0508061829570ed528@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:29:15 +0000 From: Robert S To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pkgdb -F still going after 12 hours X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:36:13 -0000 I started pkgdb -F 12 hours ago on an amd XP 2000. Its still running. I was told a while ago that it took a long time, but this seems a bit excessive. If there is a problem with the package database, is there a way that I can "reset" it and start again, or is this expected behaviour? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 01:38:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179FC16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:38:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.cinema@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9775044306 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.cinema@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so834127wra for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h/lS+pzGPN8c5RAgshbW559xFn0BiXms/OazzMZXOrGCkmEGeD98EXS4ZSb27N+E4A6LaImFpe6FeVBzHVPY59F4cJZg6V4QI+GofRYhNHVsPjqVMpIfcZIx3mekMzl1a+BQgH0oBu/ycpSoQdQQfgk43YgewJACxXyj9Ig8pWE= Received: by 10.54.36.43 with SMTP id j43mr3749555wrj; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.32.55 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <147fc4b905080618384ebabe02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:38:48 +1200 From: richard cinema To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200508062143.23543.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <147fc4b905080607385f50ead@mail.gmail.com> <200508062143.23543.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: how to deinstall the gnome2-lite port from my system completely? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:38:49 -0000 firstly, thanks you very much. i just found a another way in gnome2-faq-freebsd. by using"# pkgdb -F # pkg_delete -rf pkgconfig\* # cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-lite # make clean # make install clean " then it delete all the deps and also the xorgs(oh...). i shouldn't do that until i see your reply :D anyhow, now is compiling the stuff again.hope everything works well. On 8/7/05, RW wrote: > On Saturday 06 August 2005 15:38, richard cinema wrote: > > at first, i try to do a " make deinstall" under > > /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-lite . no error occured > > except i found all the gnome stuff stay there when i run "pkg_info" > > then. it seems the port did nothing with my "make deinstall" > > command. >=20 > gnome2-lite is a meta-port, it consists of nothing but dependencies, and > deinstalling a port does not delete dependencies. >=20 > > anybody can help me to figure out a proper solution to this problem? > > > > btw: i know a "silly and slow" way: use "pkg_delete -f " to delete all > > the gnome2 and gtk2 packages manually. well, it make me feel like a > > type machine:) >=20 > A number of those ports will actually be needed by non-gnome ports anyway= . >=20 > You can reinstall gnome2-lite and run >=20 > pkg_deinstall -Ri gnome2-lite >=20 > this will interactively delete the metaport and it's dependencies. If yo= u > choose to delete a dependency that is still required it will just fail t= o > delete. >=20 > sysutils/pkg_cutleaves is another way of handling this, and doing a gener= al > clean-up > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 01:50:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BA816A439 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010C943DA5 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:49:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j771njie030986; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:49:46 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:49:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <7093dffb0508061829570ed528@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7093dffb0508061829570ed528@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508061849.48063.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Robert S Subject: Re: pkgdb -F still going after 12 hours X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:50:53 -0000 On Saturday 06 August 2005 06:29 pm, Robert S wrote: > I started pkgdb -F 12 hours ago on an amd XP 2000. Its still > running. I was told a while ago that it took a long time, but this > seems a bit excessive. > > If there is a problem with the package database, is there a way that > I can "reset" it and start again, or is this expected behaviour? > _______________________________________________ That sounds like it is wait for you to do something. On my AMD 2400+, a "-F" used 2.5 seconds. You might try a "pkgdb -fu" and see if that clears it up. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 02:17:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2ED216A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from mail2.dm.egate.net (mail2.dm.egate.net [216.235.1.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C9743D49 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from fw.skeleton.org (h216-235-8-78.host.egate.net [216.235.8.78]) by mail2.dm.egate.net (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j772HasK087349 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:17:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from fw.skeleton.org (fw.skeleton.org [127.0.0.1]) by fw.skeleton.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j772FQdt002969 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:15:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from localhost (skeezix@localhost) by fw.skeleton.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j772FQtm002966 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:15:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.skeleton.org: skeezix owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:15:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Mitchell To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050806221350.C2146@fw.skeleton.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: telnet/sshd limited by user? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 02:17:38 -0000 Is it possible to set things so that 'telnet' is allowed only to one specific user, while everyone else needs sshd? ie: Obviously, nologin can be used as a shell to not permit any logins (but makes 'su' break too), but I'd like to allow telnet for one specific user only and keep everyone else on sshd. I could of course modify telnetd, but I'd prefer to avoid such voodoo as I'd surely forget during an upgrade later :) Thanks for any tips, jeff -- "Have you played Atari today?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 02:28:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:28:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hominid767@yahoo.com) Received: from web53505.mail.yahoo.com (web53505.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24A4B43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hominid767@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 3110 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Aug 2005 02:28:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GAuKNANas7RCNUQ6930pT5rfnaM2wvwyxHVyE9WlHRDH2lBd/TfHrKiiEzjHOklTkmKtDVX7N+DrlN2EGet5yKrPs2yHiJ/vkrJpBHnLlzAFOwD2omQnlgkX3EGFRRMnrcI3h30zke+NEamgU6DCjwN4iGB/0HLkoifEkZkESHU= ; Message-ID: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.144.119.152] by web53505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:28:18 PDT Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 19:28:18 -0700 (PDT) From: jon freddy To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Vending X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 02:28:19 -0000 To make FreeBSD even bigger, can I myself upload the ISO images onto my website and become a mirror? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 03:28:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4029416A424 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AA5442F1 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 7384 invoked by uid 207); 7 Aug 2005 02:52:18 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.19/3.81. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.98):. Processed in 0.475486 secs); 07 Aug 2005 02:52:18 -0000 Received: from dialup98.ach.sch.gr (HELO gothmog.gr) ([81.186.70.98]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 7 Aug 2005 02:52:17 -0000 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j772qEew008066; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:52:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j772qDBL008065; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:52:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:52:12 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Michael Dexter Message-ID: <20050807025212.GA8039@gothmog.gr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can file-backed memory disks act like slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:28:20 -0000 On 2005-08-07 02:13, Michael Dexter wrote: > > Hello all, > I trust this is a Seldom Asked Question... A very good one though. > I am using file-backed memory disks (as in mdconfig -f) to prototype > filesystems. > > root.img gets mounted first and usr.img, var.img and tmp.img get > mounted below it and as such they are behaving as partitions. > > Is there any way to get a single memory disk to behave like a slice > and itself be partitioned? That would give essentially: > > /dev/md0a > or even > /dev/md0s1a Yes. This should work fine. I usually create just one slice in my memory disks and then label the slice as usual. > This would allow the four partition images to be combined into a > single partitioned image. > > Yes, I have a legitimate use for this. :) HEH :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 03:44:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6698316A423 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-08.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 166564434F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 8554 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2005 03:15:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.13.157) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 03:15:08 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:18:01 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508071318.02184.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: NTOP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:44:06 -0000 will NTOP monitor SNMP or is it strictly local ? OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 03:44:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792716A427 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:44:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFFC43F40 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B846D5E9A; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72839-05; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:43:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-79-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.79.217]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C875C58; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:43:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42F57543.3040005@mac.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:43:15 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050801 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jon freddy References: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Vending X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:44:30 -0000 jon freddy wrote: > To make FreeBSD even bigger, can I myself upload the > ISO images onto my website and become a mirror? Sure. Everything you might want to know about doing so is here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/article.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 03:45:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92B16A421 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DFB43EB6 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:41:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A4BC2AAF00DC; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:41:00 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j772h0Eu096476; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 19:43:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j772gkwN096473; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Michael Dexter References: From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:42:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Michael Dexter's message of "Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:22:36 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot manager behavior questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:45:15 -0000 Michael Dexter writes: > 1. Is there any equivalent to nextboot(8) for the boot manager such that a boot selection can be made prior to the boot > sequence so that the choice can be made remotely instead of only at the console? Read about "boot0cfg's -s". And please shorten your lines. > 2. Can anyone confirm that the "Default" behavior is simply F1 (first slice) the first time it is invoked and then any > other choices become the next default? The FreeBSD BMs don't behave that way. /boot/mbr just boots the active partition and doesn't change it. The other is described in the "boot0cfg" manpage. > In theory, this should work and be the equivalent of choosing F4, right?: > > boot: 0:ad(0,4,a)/kernel > > BIOS drive 0, ata drive 0, slice 4, partition a, 5.x default boot of /kernel > > Alas, it only bells at me and gives me the same suggested syntax. Wrong; it's not the equivalent. Hitting F4 causes the bootstrap on "s4" to run. This normally starts /boot/loader but in some cases produces your "boot:" prompt. The handbook shows it in a "boot2 Screenshot". I'm unsure why you can't get the "boot:" prompter to transfer you to another slice. Maybe it requires that you pass the kernel some options. You might have better luck asking it to start /boot/loader which provides more gizmos for changing defaults, etc. > Does anyone know the syntax to perform the boot-to-cd from the boot manager feat? Not I. And you're likely to confuse people if you use "boot manager" like that. FreeBSD docs call it the "stage-two bootstrap" or something similar (even though it is seldom the second stage of the bootstrap process). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 04:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778B116A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-209-132-220.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.209.132.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F984432E for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:46:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.9] (unknown [192.168.212.9]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F156D22; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:09:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42F59221.2030609@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:46:25 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexandre D." References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can i monitor my server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 04:46:09 -0000 Theres always php that you can use which can report shell command results on a web page. since ifconfig is a root command (assuming that no one else has access to files which report net status), you can cron it to a file. thats one of many ways to do that. you can also use swatch to report it if the net interface goes down. like i said, just a couple of many ways to go around this. hope this helps, Ben Alexandre D. wrote: >you can do it with Big Brother www.bb4.org > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]De la part de Carstea >Catalin >Envoyé : samedi 6 août 2005 11:46 >À : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Objet : How can i monitor my server? > > >It is possible to monitoring activity of freebsd -services ( apache, mysqld, >squid, named, postfix ) if it is down or up via internet with some scripts? >............ >I want to know if this services is running via internet ( web page - if it >is possible) . >................... >I belive the response is in crontab with somethings to verify if the >services is running. >.................. >Sorry for my english. >............... >Pls help me! Tks! >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 05:24:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E1C16A423 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AE7442BB for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j774wLIq008241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Aug 2005 21:58:22 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050806215716.0340a980@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:59:02 -0700 To: nawcom , "Alexandre D." From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <42F59221.2030609@nawcom.no-ip.com> References: <42F59221.2030609@nawcom.no-ip.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can i monitor my server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 05:24:09 -0000 At 09:46 PM 8/6/2005, nawcom wrote: >Theres always php that you can use which can report shell command results= =20 >on a web page. since ifconfig is a root command (assuming that no one else= =20 >has access to files which report net status), you can cron it to a file. A normal user can execute ifconfig, they just can't use it to change= anything. -Glenn > thats one of many ways to do that. you can also use swatch to report it= =20 > if the net interface goes down. like i said, just a couple of many ways=20 > to go around this. >hope this helps, >Ben > >Alexandre D. wrote: > >>you can do it with Big Brother www.bb4.org >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]De la part de Carstea >>Catalin >>Envoy=E9 : samedi 6 ao=FBt 2005 11:46 >>=C0 : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>Objet : How can i monitor my server? >> >> >>It is possible to monitoring activity of freebsd -services ( apache,= mysqld, >>squid, named, postfix ) if it is down or up via internet with some= scripts? >>............ >>I want to know if this services is running via internet ( web page - if it >>is possible) . >>................... >>I belive the response is in crontab with somethings to verify if the >>services is running. >>.................. >>Sorry for my english. >>............... >>Pls help me! Tks! >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to= "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to= "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to= "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 07:23:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1131316A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9806844457 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so860945wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tCyKaCD7pp5/DFjJHwo7pym1x+uvzIzs0TenfrLGYanjWzWcCWIKhuasnl1dDVM41iXa+P7Rx2S2SU6DFiEBrzir46zGbosa6rvJdaKXA5vnwsuSEAZzZ2TCxfZRN+zeDxfmee982hdQx+CJ8Xsa9AQ9E9pptrmqQ2YlBEVHKUg= Received: by 10.54.28.16 with SMTP id b16mr4024740wrb; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:23:21 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: jon freddy In-Reply-To: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vending X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:23:23 -0000 YES! You can do ANYTHING you want with BSD licensed software including selling or including it in your propriety software (Mac OS-X). I reference the MIT license when talking about the BSD license because it's much shorter, has less legal speak, and they are more or less one and the same. Distributing your modify product as FreeBSD is not ok, this is a trademark, and copyright, matter which is not subject to the BSD license. Copyright (c) 2005 Nikolas Britton Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 07:35:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from amail1.space2u.com (amail1.space2u.com [62.20.1.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96354416A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:35:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from localhost (www-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.180]) by amail1.space2u.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j777Z0Bl013816 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:35:00 +0200 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:35:00 +0200 Message-Id: <200508070735.j777Z0Bl013816@amail1.space2u.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Joachim Dagerot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: My /var disk has crashed, how do I proceed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:35:04 -0000 My /var disk crashed this weekend. Now when I boot the system stops direct after the boot-loader starts processing. No errormessages no nothing. Where can I find resources on how to solve this problem so I can boot my system again? It's not extremely important for me to keep the system, but I have a RAID10 and a RAID5 system that I absolutely must be able to get data from. Kind regards, Joachim Dagerot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 07:37:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8585216A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:37:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829344193 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:10:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED873557A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39242-09 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A110F551F; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050807071002.A110F551F@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-07-17 - 2005-08-06 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:37:15 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 26-Jul : Bacula fund raising for encryption Bacula raises funds http://freebsddiary.org/bacula-encryption-project.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 07:39:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A916616A421 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F26C4409B for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so595936wra for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=GJwvyeAbNMMJ844ML5pe9/8TZ4Agof9URYLi7NOI8c/B2OLfw9FkjOy6hm68KtISzZby785OxfT4gf/koXRBwCMz0+V7FypBxqHSgvFaTtdPEg7N6t3srw8PPyNw15uYmhdMZSlH5xIlhR9whPBWc5FZrYJbT0+FDV9dCjhw8o0= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr3914082wrs; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 21:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:06:17 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: freebsd questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Big Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:39:54 -0000 > date && nice +20 cat /dev/urandom > testfile || date 06:27:43 to 12:44:06 (18919 seconds) > ll total 655028704 -rw-r--r-- 1 nbritton nbritton 670421843968 Aug 6 12:44 testfile > df -h|grep mnt /dev/da0s1d 679G 625G 2.0K 100% /mnt Average write speed: 670422MB / 18919 =3D 35.44MB/s (Cat was CPU bound, load was 1, P4 3E GHz) > date && cp testfile /dev/null && date 20:10:40 - 21:56:19 (6339 seconds) Average read speed: 670422MB / 6339 =3D 105.76MB/s (load was .3) Not bad for a few SATA drives > uname -a FreeBSD puddlejumper.local 5.4-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 #3: Sat Aug 6 05:51:42 CDT 2005 =20 root@puddlejumper.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SE7210TP1E i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:06:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F208916A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B980244522 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77865sc011442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:06:05 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050807010322.02a37eb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:06:48 -0700 To: "Joachim Dagerot" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <200508070735.j777Z0Bl013816@amail1.space2u.com> References: <200508070735.j777Z0Bl013816@amail1.space2u.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: My /var disk has crashed, how do I proceed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:06:11 -0000 At 12:35 AM 8/7/2005, Joachim Dagerot wrote: >My /var disk crashed this weekend. Now when I boot the system stops direct >after the boot-loader starts processing. No errormessages no nothing. You should be able to boot into single user mode. From there you should be able to do whatever you need in order to fix the problem. If you can't boot to single user mode, then you've got more problems than just your /var filesystem. -Glenn >Where can I find resources on how to solve this problem so I can boot my >system again? It's not extremely important for me to keep the system, but >I have a RAID10 and a RAID5 system that I absolutely must be able to get >data from. > >Kind regards, > >Joachim Dagerot > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:10:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD7216A434 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DCC44263 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so820570wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M5LW1OmS4zObeZ75rPpP7PdL/tBVDl7e0iBzB4ll1V2P4NiOyOiRDPK/BEmfgQR1IpPTn8cFizpoDzlgQ5lmAM8CxdM+FWHTd+GKuuIy4CuV3BKF4RHK0iB6pnQwOM45Mze4PVX8jUYAXFESmMg9JX2ykABfH5F6f9iTCOViyBw= Received: by 10.54.29.72 with SMTP id c72mr3913863wrc; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 02:42:02 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: jon freddy In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050807022818.3108.qmail@web53505.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vending X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:10:53 -0000 On 8/7/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > YES! You can do ANYTHING you want with BSD licensed software including > selling or including it in your propriety software (Mac OS-X). I > reference the MIT license when talking about the BSD license because > it's much shorter, has less legal speak, and they are more or less one > and the same. Distributing your modify product as FreeBSD is not ok, > this is a trademark, and copyright, matter which is not subject to the > BSD license. >=20 > Copyright (c) 2005 Nikolas Britton >=20 > Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining > a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the > "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including > without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, > distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to > permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to > the following conditions: >=20 > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. >=20 > THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, > EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF > MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. > IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY > CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, > TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE > SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE." >=20 This post is now licensed under version 2 of the GNU General Public License (GPL) If you post a reply to this post and distribute it, your post will be also be licensed under the GPL and will be subject to all requirements set forth in the GNU General Public License. The GNU General Public License (GPL) Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. 2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.) These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program. In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License. 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.) The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable. If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code. 4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance. 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it. 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License. 7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances. It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice. This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to be a consequence of the rest of this License. 8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License. 9. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. 10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally. NO WARRANTY 11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. 12. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms. To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found. One line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does. Copyright (C) This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode: Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `show c' for details. The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they could even be mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program. You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names: Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker. signature of Ty Coon, 1 April 1989 Ty Coon, President of Vice This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General Public License instead of this License. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:11:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5987516A475 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:11:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from bps.jodocus.org (g157016.upc-g.chello.nl [80.57.157.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F74644438 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:52:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from jodocus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bps.jodocus.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j777qoO8032638; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:52:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: (from joost@localhost) by jodocus.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j777qohn032637; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:52:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from joost) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:52:50 +0200 From: Joost Bekkers To: "Philip S. Schulz" Message-ID: <20050807075250.GA32158@bps.jodocus.org> References: <20050806170133.GA14870@bps.jodocus.org> <42F4F44E.9060804@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42F4F44E.9060804@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: measuring avg cpu speed while powerd(8) is running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:11:20 -0000 On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:33:02PM +0200, Philip S. Schulz wrote: > Joost Bekkers wrote: > > > >Is there a way to calculate (over eg. a 5 minute interval) the average > >amount the cpu was throttled? In this case by powerd(8). > > No, powerd currently reads the CPU usage periodically and adjusts the > clock speed based on the current CPU idle value. You can somewhat > influence the behavior with the options described in the powerd man page. > powerd does not keep a history of CPU usage and it does not record the > adjustments it makes. However, you could kind of record powerd > activities by starting it with the -v option and redirect stdout to a file. Perhaps I should have said that differently: it is being throttled by powerd. It doesn't have to do the measuring of the average itself. > >I was thinking there might be a counter/timer which is linked to the cpu > >clock, but sofar I haven't been able to find one. > > Well, you can see the current CPU frequency by looking at dev.cpu.0.freq > where 0 is the id of the CPU you want to query. At the times I take measurements the cpu tends to run at 100%, which would result in a nice flat line. -- greetz Joost joost@jodocus.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:19:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4A16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from amail1.space2u.com (amail1.space2u.com [62.20.1.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5DA43D55 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from localhost (www-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.180]) by amail1.space2u.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j778JUUf017698; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:19:30 +0200 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:19:30 +0200 Message-Id: <200508070819.j778JUUf017698@amail1.space2u.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Joachim Dagerot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, glenn@antimatter.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: My /var disk has crashed, how do I proceed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:19:36 -0000 >>My /var disk crashed this weekend. Now when I boot the system stops direct >>after the boot-loader starts processing. No errormessages no nothing. >You should be able to boot into single user mode. From there you should be >able to do whatever you need in order to fix the problem. >If you can't boot to single user mode, then you've got more problems than >just your /var filesystem. Thanks for your help. My system seems to stop right after the text "Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf". The /var disk is physically injured (strange quirks, the normal sound of a broken HD). I have disconnected it and have also disconnected the RocketRAID454 card with all it's harddisks. Remaining harddisk is the system disk which I think works as desired. What is the first thing the loade is doing? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:44:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAC816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DCF44360 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 38090 invoked by uid 1008); 7 Aug 2005 08:45:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 08:45:00 -0000 Received: from 24.239.176.131 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net); by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:45:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> In-Reply-To: <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 04:45:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Francisco" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:44:49 -0000 > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > >> fsck stops randomly with stuff like: >> CANNOT READ BLOCK: ######## >> evry time is different number and eventually i get: >> ad0: WARNING - removed from configuration >> ata0-master: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out > > Sounds like the HD may be near a fatal crash. > I suggest you backup as much as you can. yea.. that was my thought too but it's only one drive and i can't get it to boot all the way. and it's a laptop..... is there a way to mount remotely a laptop hdd? thanks... -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 08:53:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8822116A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F2F44348 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j778rKQF012384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:53:21 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050807014507.0e883770@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:54:03 -0700 To: "Joachim Dagerot" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <200508070819.j778JUUf017698@amail1.space2u.com> References: <200508070819.j778JUUf017698@amail1.space2u.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: My /var disk has crashed, how do I proceed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:53:24 -0000 At 01:19 AM 8/7/2005, Joachim Dagerot wrote: > >>My /var disk crashed this weekend. Now when I boot the system stops direct > >>after the boot-loader starts processing. No errormessages no nothing. > > >You should be able to boot into single user mode. From there you should be > >able to do whatever you need in order to fix the problem. > > >If you can't boot to single user mode, then you've got more problems than > >just your /var filesystem. > > >Thanks for your help. > >My system seems to stop right after the text >"Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf". The /var disk is physically injured >(strange quirks, the normal sound of a broken HD). I have disconnected it >and have also disconnected the RocketRAID454 card with all it's harddisks. >Remaining harddisk is the system disk which I think works as desired. What you would normally see after the line you mentioned is something like this: /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x444168 data=0x7d5c8+0x4fc78 syms=[0x4+0x5b390+0x4+0x7 06c9] while the kernel is loaded. After that you'll get a prompt to hit enter to boot immediately, or any other key to get a prompt. If you're not getting to point where the kernel is loading, then there's likely something wrong with your root file system. Your best bet is probably to use another system to mount the disks from the one that is failing so you can try and determine exactly what the status of your file systems is. -Glenn >What is the first thing the loade is doing? > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 10:23:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FE316A422 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.spam.me.senseless@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F644181 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:02:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.spam.me.senseless@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so613117wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=TdME0YOAXUtgGo04jXC8zFr6Y0xI14MRMUu/PAnt5Hb2snUjziGnJ+/XXm1f++V6mKWQxBqQC9h+3s2EugSrGuKqE28HBmnvynZcjRz8hW5wogQif1UbqfXdIAf2yy2mNI/ro81aSU8/35JK2xhnKP+oLO13yVPDgR+ytl0FRWE= Received: by 10.54.49.17 with SMTP id w17mr4079320wrw; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.34.24 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:02:28 +0000 From: Robert S To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: How do I use ccache and ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:23:58 -0000 A freebsd n00b question. How do I set ports up to use ccache (and distcc for that matter)? Presumably I put something into /etc/make.conf. Haven't managed to find anything on list archives or goog. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 11:58:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37D616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8012F44224 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0967211684; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:58:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:58:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Erik Norgaard To: kalin mintchev In-Reply-To: <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Francisco , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:58:23 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > >> fsck stops randomly with stuff like: > >> CANNOT READ BLOCK: ######## > >> evry time is different number and eventually i get: > >> ad0: WARNING - removed from configuration > >> ata0-master: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out > > > > Sounds like the HD may be near a fatal crash. > > I suggest you backup as much as you can. > > yea.. that was my thought too but it's only one drive and i can't get it > to boot all the way. and it's a laptop..... > > is there a way to mount remotely a laptop hdd? I just had to recover from that problem last week, also on a laptop drive. First, have you tried booting in single user? mount all drives read only, and use atacontrol to slow down the drive like this: # atacontrol mode 0 udma33 pio4 this may solve some problem. Run fsck -yf on all disks. Try editing fstab so drives are mounted read only, you can avoid mounting /var and /tmp and use memory disks for these by setting varmfs=yes in rc.conf. This may help you rescue your data while on the laptop. Another option is to buy a converter cable that lets you connect a laptop drive to a standard IDE port, if you have an ordinary station available. Cheers, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint = C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 12:00:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCF616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from mailhost.frm2.tum.de (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC044422D for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from localhost (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j77C0gAr032851; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:00:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (hades.admin.frm2 [172.25.1.10]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j77C0dpa032847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:00:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77C0dn9039197; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:00:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: (from jpulz@localhost) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j77C0d8M039196; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:00:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:00:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Joerg Pulz To: fire67 In-Reply-To: <000c01c59aa8$01d8b610$0301a8c0@danielle> Message-ID: <20050807135041.F39148@hades.admin.frm2> References: <000c01c59aa8$01d8b610$0301a8c0@danielle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mailhost.frm2.tum.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenLDAP and mails on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:00:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, fire67 wrote: > Hello , i'm on freebsd 5.4 and i use openldap-server-2.2.27 but i have a problem whith that : > > # ldapadd -x -D "cn=admin, dc=linux-win, dc=org" -W -f linux-win.ldif > Enter LDAP Password: > adding new entry "o=france,dc=linux-win,dc=org" > ldap_add: No such object (32) > > > My slapd.conf is : > > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/authldap.schema > > pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid > argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args > > access to * > by dn="cn=admin,dc=linux-win,dc=org" write > by * none > > database bdb > suffix "dc=linux-win,dc=org" > rootdn "cn=admin,dc=linux-win,dc=org" > > rootpw ******* > > directory /var/db/openldap-data > > index objectClass eq > > > > My linux-win.ldif is : > > > dn:o=france,dc=linux-win,dc=org > o: france > objectClass: top > objectClass: organization > objectClass: CourierDomainAlias > virtualdomain: mail.linux-win.org > virtualdomainuser: mail.linux-win.org/ > > dn:cn=admin,o=france,dc=masociete,dc=com > cn: admin > mail: admin@mail.linux-win.org > maildrop: admin@mail.linux-win.org > sn: Administrations > objectClass: top > objectClass: inetOrgPerson > objectClass: CourierMailAlias > > dn:cn=flob2009,o=france,dc=linux-win,dc=org > cn: flob2009 > gidNumber: 0 > mail: flob2009@mail.linux-win.org > sn: Florian > uidNumber: 0 > mailbox: mail.linux-win.org/flob2009/ > objectClass: top > objectClass: inetOrgPerson > objectClass: CourierMailAccount > userPassword: {CRYPT}Qigb3vRISRuSo > homeDirectory: /home/vmail/ > > dn:cn=support,o=france,dc=linux-win.org,dc=org > cn: support > gidNumber: 0 > mail: support@mail.linux-win.org > sn: Support > uidNumber: 0 > mailbox: mail.linux-win.org/support/ > objectClass: top > objectClass: inetOrgPerson > objectClass: CourierMailAccount > userPassword: {CRYPT}ie11d2640RGJQ > homeDirectory: /home/vmail/ > > > > I don't understand why it says no such object. did you create an object for your configured suffix before trying to add any other objects? if not, the error message is completely right. try to add the following with ldapadd: dn: dc=linux-win,dc=org objectClass: dcObject objectClass: organization dc: linux-win o: My Organization After that, you should be able to create your entries as long as they belong to the suffix you configured in your slapd.conf. So please take a deeper look at your file, as some of the entries belong to other suffixes! good luck Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9ffnSPOsGF+KA+MRAu7/AKDOXoJlPgShSGTKimd588TecFfYaQCbBQ7F e6oNcS3/225Tfdp0EFZTNtg= =pniz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 12:15:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A44E16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E5843D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5254AE4F; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C86E12B140; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22906-10; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5210F12B104; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F5FB48.4020804@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:15:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert S References: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I use ccache and ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:15:58 -0000 Robert S wrote: > A freebsd n00b question. How do I set ports up to use ccache [...] > Presumably I put something into /etc/make.conf. Yes, add the following lines to /etc/make.conf CC="/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc" CXX="/usr/local/libexec/ccache/c++" Björn -- Björn König (bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) student at the Technische Universität Berlin http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 12:56:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE16816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:56:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E30C43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:56:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:56:12 +0200 id 00000018.42F604EC.000006C8 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:56:33 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:56:19 -0000 I have a 24/7 server running FreeBSD-4.11-stable. All my other machines run 5.4 though. It's easier to maintain one version instead of two, so my question is simple: Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 12:59:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel.s@manuscript-els.com) Received: from otradno.ru (mail.otradno.ru [213.85.16.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB9B743D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel.s@manuscript-els.com) Received: (qmail 17716 invoked by uid 0); 7 Aug 2005 12:58:24 -0000 Received: from daniel.s@manuscript-els.com by otradno.ru by uid 407 with qmail-scanner-1.10 (Clear:0. Processed in 0.025014 secs); 07 Aug 2005 12:58:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.manuscript) (10.21.49.6) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 12:58:24 -0000 From: Daniel Sammut To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Manuscript ELS Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:01:40 +0400 Message-Id: <1123419700.623.0.camel@localhost.manuscript> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problems with Automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: daniel.s@manuscript-els.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:59:16 -0000 Hello, I am fairly new to FreeBSD having only used it for about a month. I am using FreeBSD 5.4 release. I have recently got round to setting up amd. I followed the instructions to do this on a website I found - http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd/automounting.txt After following the instructions, and rebooting the machine, I notice that my logs give these messages: nfs send error 49 for server pid357@freya:/host nfs server pid357@freya:/host: not responding and typing "amq" gives this message: amq: localhost: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to send I double checked my setup of amd, and that I followed the instructions exactly. Everything seems correct. I have actually set up amd successfully using the same instructions on another computer on which I installed FreeBSD 5.4. What do you think the problem could be? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:15:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA7616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495314405D for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A77BBD8A0094; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:15:23 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77EHRTA010524; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:17:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j77EHHGr010521; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:17:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Mark Kane References: <104289012.20050806205943@rulez.sk> <3.0.5.32.20050806135119.00f37a88@mail.farreaches.org> <104289012.20050806205943@rulez.sk> <3.0.5.32.20050806181109.00f1fda8@mail.farreaches.org> <42F55657.6080700@mkproductions.org> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:17:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42F55657.6080700@mkproductions.org> (Mark Kane's message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:31:19 -0500") Message-ID: <2hvf2hltle.f2h@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: After Partitioning a Drive: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRCerror (retrying request) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:15:27 -0000 Mark Kane writes: > This is a brand new motherboard. Giga-Byte GA-K8NS Pro. FreeBSD > 5.4-RELEASE (amd64). > > I was also doing some searching around and found a list post about > FreeBSD 5 and DMA write problems: I've got a GA-K8NSC-939 running 5.4-R (i386) with two 80GB using UDMA100 that I've run pretty hard occasionally with dump/restore, diff -r kind of operations, with no problems. I ran 5.4-R (amd64) lightly for a few days without noticing disk problems. You said one of your disks was a slave. I've read rumors that that's a bad thing if its master is a CDROM, but I'd think it should just run slower than it's capable of. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:18:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFD716A446 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlessmyth@utvinternet.com) Received: from ni-mail3.dna.utvinternet.net (mail3.u.tv [194.46.8.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0E643E67 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:46:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlessmyth@utvinternet.com) Received: from utvinternet.com (unverified [194.46.8.35]) by ni-mail3.dna.utvinternet.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.1.361.20) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:50 +0100 From: "Charles Smyth" Sender: fn15790@utvinternet.com To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:50 +0100 X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.8a, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <42f610ca.164.0@utvinternet.com> X-User-Info: 62.254.32.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: charlessmyth@utvinternet.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:18:06 -0000 Hi guys, I am running FreBSD 5.4 and wondered what the sittuation is with installing the JRE so that OpenOffice is fully functional. Charles Smyth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:21:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7600D16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B2643D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705687DAE; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:21:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:21:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: kalin mintchev In-Reply-To: <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> Message-ID: <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: francisco@natserv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:21:20 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > yea.. that was my thought too but it's only one drive and i can't get it > to boot all the way. and it's a laptop..... > > is there a way to mount remotely a laptop hdd? Other than mounting the drive on another machine to see how much you can read, not much else I can suggest. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:39:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9518E16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:39:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AED43D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536F54AE2A; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F7412B140; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:38:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53062-01; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:38:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F64312B104; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:38:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F61CF3.1070001@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:38:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:39:39 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > I have a 24/7 server running FreeBSD-4.11-stable. > All my other machines run 5.4 though. > > It's easier to maintain one version instead of two, so my question is > simple: > > Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. Do you mean stable, literally "the machine doesn't panic permanently" or -STABLE in terms of the system API and development? All FreeBSD releases should not reboot spontaneously, but finally it depends on the installed software and the quality of hardware and its drivers. In case you mean the other term of stable: 5.x has been declared -STABLE one year ago. Björn -- Björn König (bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) student at the Technische Universität Berlin http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:43:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A2516A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:43:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E6C43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:43:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADFFB8E20140; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:43:11 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77EjFMi010940; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:45:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j77Ej9aE010937; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:45:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> <42F5FB48.4020804@cs.tu-berlin.de> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:45:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42F5FB48.4020804@cs.tu-berlin.de> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig's?= message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:15:04 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Robert S , =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: How do I use ccache and ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:43:20 -0000 Björn König writes: > Robert S wrote: > >> A freebsd n00b question. How do I set ports up to use ccache [...] >> Presumably I put something into /etc/make.conf. > > Yes, add the following lines to /etc/make.conf > > CC="/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc" > CXX="/usr/local/libexec/ccache/c++" /usr/ports/devel/ccache/pkg-descr makes that sound like A Good Thing. Any ideas why it's not built into cc/c++, or FreeBSD scripts? Should we all be using it? Reasons not to? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:44:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA00B16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:44:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C77943D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:44:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF924AE2A; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE1112B140; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53062-02; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791C012B104; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F61E1F.3080501@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:43:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: fbsdq Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:44:35 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. I forgot to say that FreeBSD 5 is ready for use in production environments. Björn -- Björn König (bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) student at the Technische Universität Berlin http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:46:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4866716A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E99143D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:46:03 +0200 id 00000024.42F61EAB.00000827 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:46:03 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050807144603.GA2057@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> <42F61CF3.1070001@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42F61CF3.1070001@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:46:05 -0000 On 07 Aug Björn König wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > >I have a 24/7 server running FreeBSD-4.11-stable. > In case you mean the other term of stable: 5.x has been declared > -STABLE one year ago. I know that and of course will bad hard-/software destabalize a system. But what I ment of course was the 24 hours a day usage! Are there caveats to that with 5.4? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:47:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358FA16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F79443D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:47:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:47:13 +0200 id 000000E1.42F61EF1.00000836 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:47:13 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050807144713.GB2057@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> <42F61E1F.3080501@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42F61E1F.3080501@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:47:15 -0000 On 07 Aug Björn König wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > >If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. > > I forgot to say that FreeBSD 5 is ready for use in production > environments. Thank you. The former message was out and this one came in ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:48:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8B16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com (lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB2043D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([70.183.13.213]) by lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050807144800.YXFO15469.lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:48:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 23702 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Aug 2005 14:56:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:56:23 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050807145623.GE671@sentinelchicken.net> References: <1123419700.623.0.camel@localhost.manuscript> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1123419700.623.0.camel@localhost.manuscript> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Problems with Automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:48:02 -0000 On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:01:40PM +0400, Daniel Sammut wrote: > Hello, > > I am fairly new to FreeBSD having only used it for about a month. I am > using FreeBSD 5.4 release. > > I have recently got round to setting up amd. I followed the instructions > to do this on a website I found - > http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd/automounting.txt > > > After following the instructions, and rebooting the machine, I notice > that my logs give these messages: > > > nfs send error 49 for server pid357@freya:/host > nfs server pid357@freya:/host: not responding > > > and typing "amq" gives this message: > > amq: localhost: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to send > > > I double checked my setup of amd, and that I followed the instructions > exactly. Everything seems correct. > > I have actually set up amd successfully using the same instructions on > another computer on which I installed FreeBSD 5.4. > > What do you think the problem could be? > Are your trying to automount an NFS server? Are you sure you have /etc/exports set up correctly on the NFS server to allow access from the client in question? -Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:48:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE8E16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fierykylin@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1478D43D49 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fierykylin@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so490780nzd for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=efGSYjsFZ2qtEnRD0zTJxbT1tnqpGqQGg4R76WIUfxAsP328xdF6P3wLOAuHXmNcZzCcG6JBZqJ2BA3Q5vmJU3P1t3WeGuVpfdp9ekqG3323UHID4Y7bs4Vtp28nUGZazcXyT/eewJj+s1UgPUKtaLlWUYfM/uIakHZWmL8Fcow= Received: by 10.37.13.60 with SMTP id q60mr438668nzi; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.104.10 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <87ab37ab05080707485334af91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:48:14 +0800 From: kylin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: any maillist for Freebsd Device Driver Developing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:48:17 -0000 there is architecture handbook ,there is devleper handbook ,but is there mailist for the driver discussion? --=20 we who r about to die,salute u! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 17:35:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6672E16A41F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CDD43D60 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EA77E25; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:35:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:35:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Sander Holthaus - Orange XL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050806133114.J38067@zoraida.natserv.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:51:17 +0000 Cc: 'David Banning' , questions@freebsd.org, "'Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC'" Subject: RE: question on hosting and memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:35:13 -0000 On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote: > You might want to consider LiteSpeed WebServer. They have a standard (free) The specs for that seem very interesting. What has been your experience with that program so far? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 22:11:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB1F16A41F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8AF43D55 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:11:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so263082wri for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:11:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QxKrOPED4SqmYhd846FjvLUZ4+Eaep+Ax+QvI2H1ovYdkIeUYsPbFDXb7J84NQubII8X0PC2/JNNLmdF2CFyApvvW2jHhcqOpV5tySUjFEhhhado8uEuluMU4hA1Xj5bu3pcQKvm3rju60Mk+UKPbYbJe7OSnVMNeRZ+K39aSOU= Received: by 10.54.53.62 with SMTP id b62mr3738664wra; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:11:37 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Mervin McDougall In-Reply-To: <20050806175455.33614.qmail@web30903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050806175455.33614.qmail@web30903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:51:17 +0000 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd questions Subject: Re: Conflict between high resolution console and X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:11:40 -0000 On 8/6/05, Mervin McDougall wrote: > Hi all > I have been experimenting with FreeBSD 6.0 BETA 2 on > my laptop which uses a ati radeon Mobile Utiliy 1 > (IGP 320M) video vard. I have been able to configure > both high console resolution MODE_279 and X on the > laptop, however I have noticed that this error turns > up whenever I boot the system or restart X : >=20 > drm0: port > 0x9000-0x90ff mem > 0xe8000000-0xefffffff,0xe0100000-0xe010ffff irq 9 at > device 5.0 on pci1 > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.16.0 20050311 on > minor 0 > error: [drm:pid2557:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* > radeon_cp_init called without lock held > error: [drm:pid2557:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 2557 > using kernel context 0 >=20 > After much googling and scanning of my system, I > figured a quick way to get rid of the error message, > by disabling dri in the xorg.conf. But that is not the > only problem I discovered. I noticed that when playing > music there is constant annoying repeating of the > sound until the console displays. This only happens > when switching from X to high resolution console. > Switching back does not reproduce the problem. I've always had that problem on my patched freebsd 5 (had it setup for months) system. Scrolling (scroll lock) will do it to... It may help to play with the sysctls for: hw.snd.pcm%d.buffersize: Configure the amount of DMA bufferspace available for a device.... jack this up to like 16384 hw.snd.targetirqrate: Set the default block size such that continuous playback will achieve this IRQ rate. This value can be tuned to improve application performance. =20 Increase this value when the sound lags and decrease it if sound stutters or breaks up..... just this up to You set them with loader.conf, here's what I have in mine: hw.snd.maxautovchans=3D4 hw.snd.targetirqrate=3D36 hint.pcm.0.buffersize=3D"16384" You can check it with: sysctl -a hw.snd=20 >=20 > Incidentally, I deleted my xorg.conf and restarted the > server in error and this cause Xorg to generate X > using its own built in defaults. Consequently this > solved the problem of the choppy repetitive music. >=20 > Similarly, If I have a configured xorg.conf and I > restart X after booting (CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE) the > problem goes away. > I haven't been able to pin the problem down to > discover how to get rid of the problem and still have > a workable and have an xorg.conf without having to > restart the X server. Can anyone share their thoughts > ? >=20 > Mervin McDougall >=20 >=20 >=20 > ____________________________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:56:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938916A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:56:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jack@raats.xs4all.nl) Received: from zeus.jarasoft.net (raats.xs4all.nl [80.126.151.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727FD43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:56:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jack@raats.xs4all.nl) Received: from zeus.jarasoft.net (localhost.jarasoft.net [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8E0AE06; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:56:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jara2 (unknown [10.0.0.152]) by zeus.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EFDABE1; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:55:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <002101c59b60$24cdcd00$9800000a@jara2> From: "Jack Raats" To: "Dick Hoogendijk" References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st><42F61E1F.3080501@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20050807144713.GB2057@lothlorien.nagual.st> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:55:58 +0200 Organization: Jack Raats MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original X-Priority: 3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:56:05 -0000 Dick, Never change a winning team! Why would you upgrade if everything is runni= ng=20 smooth and stable? Jack ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Dick Hoogendijk" To: "freebsd-questions" Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 4:47 PM Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable On 07 Aug Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > >If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. > > I forgot to say that FreeBSD 5 is ready for use in production > environments. Thank you. The former message was out and this one came in ;-) --=20 dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 15:30:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDCE16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:30:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E303B4412C for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4EC7E01; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:30:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:30:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: kalin mintchev In-Reply-To: <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> Message-ID: <20050807112847.U48843@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: francisco@natserv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:30:09 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > > can i just hook up a laptop hdd in a desktop machine? No. Another poster sent you comments on that. You need to get a Kit. Should not cost much though. Basically some mounting brackets and a cable... although for your case probably just the cable and you can do the work with the case open and the drive on the side. May also need some type of power convertor. I have never done it, but I am aware there are kits for it... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 15:41:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC33D16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB1543E63 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 62098 invoked by uid 1008); 7 Aug 2005 15:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 15:10:37 -0000 Received: from 24.239.176.131 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net); by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:10:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> In-Reply-To: <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:10:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: francisco@natserv.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: kalin mintchev , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:41:25 -0000 > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > >> yea.. that was my thought too but it's only one drive and i can't get >> it >> to boot all the way. and it's a laptop..... >> >> is there a way to mount remotely a laptop hdd? > > Other than mounting the drive on another machine to see how much you can > read, not much else I can suggest. > can i just hook up a laptop hdd in a desktop machine? -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 15:56:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C5916A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeansen@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79D443D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:56:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeansen@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so816524rna for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=olL6tSh+sAbO/+d/1DFKfBtkQpCEMOBTphde7SYcJ4ApbeixiRwo+nFVgzPEiV9M6+8U1gK1oHDGy9yvRh3lOAvRbIJGBrQHw5XoQ3qpoElbudzd+IA5loAOY0lKdQ8vapIlhv1Y8Z+EiBJ0FH8hizTOwnne9T20rmGzWj0qsRI= Received: by 10.38.13.14 with SMTP id 14mr2285593rnm; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from VM-WORK ([80.133.236.115]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c3sm9704032rne.2005.08.07.08.56.12; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:56:23 +0200 From: Marcel Lautenbach X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.30) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <251025804.20050807175623@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: error installing some ports after fress system-install - bsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcel Lautenbach List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:56:16 -0000 Hi folks, I'am rather new to bsd and just came up with some errors while installing bsd 5.4 . So, first I've installed bsd the standard way. After installing I went back the the post-configuration. Then I tried installing some ports for kde and gnome. For the ease of installing I just seleced the meta-ports. I also selected some editors. (emacs and vim) Well, and that's it. I clicked "Install". But, after some ports sysinstall came up with an error that said: Add of package shared-mime-info-0-15_9 abortet, error code 1 - Please check the debug screen for mor info. and the debug screen said: tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or format pkg_add: tar extract of - failed! pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from '-' not a package? These errors were the samt the following packages, as well.: tcl-0.4.7.1 tiff-33731_2 rplay-3.3.2_2 Xaw3d-1.5_1 Can anyone help me with this matter? I haven't got a clue what these errors derive from. Did I miss something? Ore is there realy something wrong? Thanks Marcel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 16:12:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D5916A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D1143D49 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:12:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D55C4AE2A; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F0112B140; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56550-07; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:11:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5596012B16E; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:11:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F6329D.9050803@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:11:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary W. Swearingen" References: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> <42F5FB48.4020804@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: Robert S , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I use ccache and ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:12:03 -0000 Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > /usr/ports/devel/ccache/pkg-descr > makes that sound like A Good Thing. > > Any ideas why it's not built into cc/c++, Because these are compilers, not compiler caches. I suppose it's not the task of a compiler to speed up the build process, but rather producing good binaries from source code. I think of the Unix dogma "one task, one tool". > or FreeBSD scripts? > > Should we all be using it? Reasons not to? It doesn't work always, e.g. the FreeBSD 6.0 userland on amd64 won't build properly using ccache. Regards Björn -- Björn König (bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) student at the Technische Universität Berlin http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 16:18:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0635916A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8569D43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561704AC10; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0C512B140; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56550-08; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:17:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E212B104; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:17:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F63434.8050603@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:17:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcel Lautenbach References: <251025804.20050807175623@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <251025804.20050807175623@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error installing some ports after fress system-install - bsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:18:48 -0000 Marcel Lautenbach wrote: > [...] > So, first I've installed bsd the standard way. After installing I went back the the post-configuration. > Then I tried installing some ports for kde and gnome. For the ease of installing I just seleced the meta-ports. I also selected some editors. (emacs and vim) > Well, and that's it. I clicked "Install". > But, after some ports sysinstall came up with an error that said: > > Add of package shared-mime-info-0-15_9 abortet, error code 1 - Please check the debug screen for mor info. > > and the debug screen said: > tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or format > pkg_add: tar extract of - failed! > pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from '-' not a package? > [...] I never did it this way, i.e. with sysinstall. I heard from other users that this often causes errors. Install additional packages as described in the handbook chapter 4 and 5. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ Regards Björn -- Björn König (bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) student at the Technische Universität Berlin http://bkoenig.alpha-tierchen.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 16:59:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A591616A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:59:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com (lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D1244133 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:59:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([70.183.13.213]) by lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050807165904.ZEXT15469.lakecmmtar04.coxmail.com@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:59:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 24349 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Aug 2005 17:07:28 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:07:28 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050807170728.GD24024@sentinelchicken.net> References: <000401c59b70$3627fd40$ba36fb93@KLOBOUCEK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000401c59b70$3627fd40$ba36fb93@KLOBOUCEK> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: kernel panic on 5.4-RELEASE-p6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:59:04 -0000 On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 06:51:09PM +0200, Petr Holub wrote: > Hi all, > > I've encoutnered the follwing kernel panic on 5.4-RELEASE-p6. However, > as the machine is production and not development one, I don't have > debugger analysis. The panic might *theoretically* be due to problems > accessing faulty CD-R media in the ATAPI DVD/CD-RW drive (that was the > only unusual thing which happened before the panic). Kernel config > and dmesg are attached below, the machine is IBM T41p laptop. > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x300f0 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0x300f0 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xe67cdb1c > frame pointer = 0x10:0xe67cdb34 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 1337 (vim) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > Uptime: 14m43s. > I've had a similar issue (or at least it looks similar to the untrained eye) on an old laptop of mine that I was trying to install with 5.4, 5.3, then 4.11. I posted the error to the mailing list, but was never able to solve the problem. Be interested to know if someone has a solution. -Jason Morgan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 17:11:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9C16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE11F43D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:11:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so797972rne for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OMCukxQ09KTSOV+AYDyRn04bF9XoSww84Z7iZ8tOOepwkbAhy9rirU0RuKgRFi1+nFpw4ajeBL8g6ZzHStUR3TMkMy1jrzXYqkERzrh1J2U8qpwmizut8BHVFSMEoOUoy3ysjbczW3bDq3QaQ+yFlGfOoEG4mrtf15kJjSA+77c= Received: by 10.39.2.26 with SMTP id e26mr2246996rni; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.87.103? ([67.171.11.85]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 70sm4283176rnc.2005.08.07.10.11.53; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42F63EF1.2070501@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:03:45 -0700 From: Kurt Buff User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren References: <200508071318.02184.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200508071318.02184.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTOP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kurt.buff@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:11:55 -0000 Warren wrote: > will NTOP monitor SNMP or is it strictly local ? > > OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE ntop is not about SNMP, it's about packet capture. It's a passive listener which analyses traffic flow and makes nice pictures about it via an embedded web server. Excellent tool, but MRTG might be more of what you're looking for. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 17:33:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F7A16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E6443D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.144]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IKV00B8A4MUX550@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.148]) by pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IKV00KFV4MUK0I0@pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (S0106000f3d63c5a5.vc.shawcable.net [24.85.154.162]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IKV00E104MU1J@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.338 [267.10.1]); Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:30:46 -0700 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:30:46 -0700 From: Graham North To: questions freebsd Message-id: <42F64546.6000506@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-42F6454672BE=======" X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: cupsd broken child X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:33:08 -0000 --=======AVGMAIL-42F6454672BE======= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello again: I recently installed CUPS on a 4.11 webserver. After a few problems everything got sorted and ran fine for a couple days. Yesterday I set an alias for lp and everything seems to have broken. To ease text file formatting I set: alias lp='lp -o page-left=15 -o page-top=15' This was done to make text file printout more pretty as the default put the borders hard at the edge of the paper. When entered at the command line, the above options work well. (this is the cups lp daemon). Not only did the alias not work but now something seems to really be broken. I have tried unalias to fix it, have rebooted etc.... On reboot now, dmesg gives output: cupsd" child exited with status 2! (exclamation provided courtesy bsd) cups: unable to start scheduler Trying to start manually from cups.sh gives me the same message. dmesg does not indicate problems with parallel port ppc0 or lpt0. Can anyone help me to figure out what might have happened and how to fix? Thanks, Graham/ -- Kindness can be infectious - try it. Graham North Vancouver, BC www.soleado.ca --=======AVGMAIL-42F6454672BE======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 8/4/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-42F6454672BE=======-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 17:43:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E5516A43B for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from smtp5.suscom.net (smtp5.suscom.net [64.78.83.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEB443D45 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:43:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D46E510254 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp5.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27377-03-7 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp5.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 856F4510226 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:43:55 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Gerard@smtp5.suscom.net, Seibert@smtp5.suscom.net Message-Id: <20050807133730.E3C3.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.21.03 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new .250 at suscom.net Subject: Post JDK14 installation requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@suscom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:43:59 -0000 In order to install JDK14, I need to run both of these commands: kldload linprocfs mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc After rebooting the system, do I have to re-run those commands again for java to be active? Would it be beneficial to put the mount command in /etc/fstab? I am not sure how to get the other one to run automatically at bootup if it is required. -- Gerard E. Seibert gerard-seibert@suscom.net He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god. Aristotle From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:20:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DE816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:20:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm12.prodigy.net (ylpvm12-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8D643F41 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (pimout5-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.21]) by ylpvm12.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j77IKrck028810 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:20:53 -0400 X-ORBL: [66.139.109.212] Received: from [192.168.1.45] (ppp-66-139-109-212.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [66.139.109.212]) by pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77IKmCl085528 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:20:53 -0400 Message-ID: <42F65ECF.20307@mkproductions.org> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:19:43 -0500 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050620) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to recover data? - Formatted, Fdisk'd, and disklabeled ad1, now ad0 with FreeBSD is messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:20:55 -0000 Hi everyone. I am in the process of taking the data from 4 NTFS drives, copying them to a temporary drive, and then formatting them, and creating partitions in UFS to be used with FreeBSD. I was having some problems with DMA errors on one of the drives yesterday, so it was suggested I try another one of the drives to narrow down the problem. So last night, I copy a nearly full 60GB drive (ad1) to my 160GB temporary FreeBSD drive (ad0). I checksum all the data to make sure it all copied correctly, and shut down for the night. This morning, I came back to format the 60GB drive. I formatted it and ran it through fdisk and disklabel. Whenever I do something like this, I always make sure I double and triple check that it says the correct drive at the top. In this case, it did. It said at the top I was modifying ad1 (the 60GB). I mounted the drive to make sure it worked, and it did. I went to reboot one final time, which I guess I shouldn't have done. After rebooting, it didn't come to the FreeBSD boot screens. I tried rebooting a few more times in case something happened along the way. Still nothing. I found the FreeBSD 5.4 install CD and booted to the FixIt live filesystem. I tried to look for my ad0 data, and I only saw /dev/ad0 and /dev/ad0s1. I mounted /dev/ad0s1, and it's my root (/) partition from before. I don't see any ad0s2, ad0s3, ad0s4, etc. As for ad1, I see ad1s1, ad1s1c, and ad1s1d. ad1s1 gives "Operation Not Permitted" when I try to mount it. ad1s1c and ad1s1d just show ".snap/" directories when I mount and ls them. If anyone has any suggestions I would be very much obliged. The 160GB drive (ad0) has two nearly full hard drives' data, and almost 10 years of important data on it. Thanks very much in advance. -Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:27:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36EE16A425 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B95743F00 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:08:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77I8FlN064808; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:08:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j77I8FKi064805; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:08:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:08:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: kalin mintchev In-Reply-To: <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> Message-ID: <20050807120441.Y64769@wonkity.com> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:08:15 -0600 (MDT) Cc: francisco@natserv.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:27:18 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > can i just hook up a laptop hdd in a desktop machine? Yes, with a 40-to-44-pin IDE adapter. The pins on a 2.5-inch laptop drive are spaced closer together than on a 3.5-inch drive. Before doing that, though, it's worth downloading a copy of the FreeSBIE CD and booting with that: http://www.freesbie.org/ Even if you can't mount the hard drive, you at least ought to be able to dd data from it. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:27:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D423116A424 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:27:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D628F43D5C for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388F35D28; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:54:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02474-02; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-79-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.79.217]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8D75C67; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42F64ABB.2010809@mac.com> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:54:03 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050801 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gerard-seibert@suscom.net References: <20050807133730.E3C3.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> In-Reply-To: <20050807133730.E3C3.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Post JDK14 installation requirements X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:27:20 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > In order to install JDK14, I need to run both of these commands: > > kldload linprocfs > mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc > > After rebooting the system, do I have to re-run those commands again for > java to be active? Would it be beneficial to put the mount command in > /etc/fstab? I am not sure how to get the other one to run automatically > at bootup if it is required. Normally, one would run those commands once, and use the java port to build a native Java for FreeBSD, which is being bootstrapped from running the precompiled Linux Java package you have to download yourself from Sun. Once you have a native FreeBSD java package, you don't need to mount linprocfs or use Linux emulation to run java.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:32:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546D416A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99B443D55 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:32:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A3B7230200B6; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:32:23 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77IYSFg014960; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:34:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j77IYNWK014959; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:34:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= References: <7093dffb050807030255a2dbdd@mail.gmail.com> <42F5FB48.4020804@cs.tu-berlin.de> <42F6329D.9050803@cs.tu-berlin.de> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:34:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42F6329D.9050803@cs.tu-berlin.de> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig's?= message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:11:09 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I use ccache and ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:32:28 -0000 Björn König writes: > Because these are compilers, not compiler caches. I suppose it's not the task of a compiler to speed up the build > process, but rather producing good binaries from source code. I think of the Unix dogma "one task, one tool". GCC violates that one almost as much as Emacs. :) GNU is Not Unix, it seems. And I'm guessing that compilers use lots of caches; GCC just hasn't (yet) bought into optionally maintaining some caches between invocations to keep things simple, so the manpage is only 2600 lines. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:34:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0911816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:34:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from rader.servnow.com (rader.servnow.com [69.93.129.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FE543D64 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from 12-210-221-89.client.insightbb.com ([12.210.221.89] helo=familysquires.net) by rader.servnow.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1E1pyE-0007QA-Mx for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:34:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:34:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> Message-ID: <20050807132841.C52481@familysquires.net> References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rader.servnow.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - siralan.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:34:13 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. > The only show-stopper I've run into has been my inability to get "gvinum" or "vinum" (my understanding is that "gvinum" has replaced "vinum" in 5.4-STABLE and later) to work reliably under 5.4-RELEASE or 5.4-STABLE with RAID5 arrays. Otherwise I can't tell any difference with respect to reliability. Mike Squires From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:39:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C4416A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:39:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47E2443DCD for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:39:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Aug 2005 18:39:38 -0000 Received: from p54A40938.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.35]) [84.164.9.56] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 07 Aug 2005 20:39:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <42F6341A.3060309@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:17:30 +0200 From: "Philip S. Schulz" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joost Bekkers References: <20050806170133.GA14870@bps.jodocus.org> <42F4F44E.9060804@gmx.de> <20050807075250.GA32158@bps.jodocus.org> In-Reply-To: <20050807075250.GA32158@bps.jodocus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: measuring avg cpu speed while powerd(8) is running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:39:42 -0000 Joost Bekkers wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:33:02PM +0200, Philip S. Schulz wrote: > >>Joost Bekkers wrote: >> >>>Is there a way to calculate (over eg. a 5 minute interval) the average >>>amount the cpu was throttled? In this case by powerd(8). >> [...] > > Perhaps I should have said that differently: it is being throttled by powerd. > It doesn't have to do the measuring of the average itself. > So you're looking for a history of the CPU frequency, similar to the history of CPU usage? I don't think the kernel keeps any such statistics. But you should take a look at the man page or possibly the sources of the driver you're using, e.g. est or powernow. > >>>I was thinking there might be a counter/timer which is linked to the cpu >>>clock, but sofar I haven't been able to find one. >> >>Well, you can see the current CPU frequency by looking at dev.cpu.0.freq >>where 0 is the id of the CPU you want to query. > > At the times I take measurements the cpu tends to run at 100%, which would > result in a nice flat line. > I don't really understand what you mean. What problem are you trying to solve? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:45:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A893716A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from amail1.space2u.com (amail1.space2u.com [62.20.1.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B6443D46 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:45:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from localhost (www-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.180]) by amail1.space2u.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77IjZdo030754 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:45:35 +0200 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:45:35 +0200 Message-Id: <200508071845.j77IjZdo030754@amail1.space2u.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Joachim Dagerot" To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RocketRaid 454 in FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:45:39 -0000 My freeBSD 5.3 system supports HighPoint RocketRaid 454 flawless, using Highpoints own driver. The freeBSD 5.4 panics if I load Highpoints driver (marked for version 5.3) and without loading it it simply doesn't identify it as a single unit. I can't find support for the RocketRaid 454 in the hardware notes for freeBSD 5.4, is this device being left out? //Joachim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 19:39:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA91E16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:39:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D243EEA for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:39:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so659688wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LlNcaAXggGYMy+7FBMNHbE9gNxoCl9aCpTBpBzQAIyCZ+F881qRgK2KX4MpeMAQw9RkCYkB0KHG7GXKiE0BIEEPyrWYpWtcpnTi0/pQpooDWK9jdH025MxEKKMKZzOLg3C3R01uvasoolursRsgCvURtvgxB+LZ88ARFMGXub3A= Received: by 10.54.11.20 with SMTP id 20mr4381427wrk; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:39:10 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Joachim Dagerot In-Reply-To: <200508071845.j77IjZdo030754@amail1.space2u.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200508071845.j77IjZdo030754@amail1.space2u.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RocketRaid 454 in FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:39:11 -0000 On 8/7/05, Joachim Dagerot wrote: >=20 > My freeBSD 5.3 system supports HighPoint RocketRaid 454 flawless, using H= ighpoints own driver. >=20 > The freeBSD 5.4 panics if I load Highpoints driver (marked for version 5.= 3) and without loading it it simply doesn't identify it as a single unit. >=20 Does it show up as da0? when the driver is loaded or device ar0? > I can't find support for the RocketRaid 454 in the hardware notes for fre= eBSD 5.4, is this device being left out? Yes. Only the 182x (and maybe 181x) SATA RAID cards are supported natively with FreeBSD... not including ata supported highpoint cards like the RockerRAID 100 that show up as device ar. You could try the mkIII patches (now part of FreeBSD 6) and see if that works... I had to do that to get one of my RAID cards to work... here's an install script I made to apply the patches, cvsup your src first: test -d /tmp/mk3n-releng5 && cd /tmp/mk3n-releng5 || mkdir /tmp/mk3n-releng5 && cd /tmp/mk3n-releng5 test -e ata-mk3n-releng5.tar.gz || fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/ata-mk3n-releng5.tar.gz test -e ata-mk3n.diff-releng5.gz || fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/ata-mk3n.diff-releng5.gz rm -r /usr/src/sys/dev/ata cd /usr/src tar -zxf /tmp/mk3n-releng5/ata-mk3n-releng5.tar.gz gunzip -c /tmp/mk3n-releng5/ata-mk3n.diff-releng5.gz | patch -s && echo "do= ne" and then do a buildworld / kernel. Gmail btw wraped the first 3 lines of that script. If that does not work you will need to talk to highpoint for a driver update, ask them if they can do an openbuild like they did for the 182x so that the FreeBSD team can build a native driver etc., send them a backtrace of the kernel panic too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 19:50:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910B416A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:50:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ces.fci@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888C043E4A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ces.fci@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so894133wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:26:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PZDq4Ouk6zcjmrjROcvl0Ij0tyXs0Bvqduyn6oX8npG31FX0CcwJJhmYEI0Ib7cYbq7vSr2wtimECJd7E9mHVFoamL3BxDEu40e5PS/fU591O4NvsgT/20q2IaRqzcghaKtq8PoofbCYLS9SlLsGXAdFxMQo6zUFQv2DXEgktSM= Received: by 10.54.121.6 with SMTP id t6mr396748wrc; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.114.19 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:26:17 -0500 From: fci To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: <2hvf2hltle.f2h@mail.opusnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3.0.5.32.20050806135119.00f37a88@mail.farreaches.org> <104289012.20050806205943@rulez.sk> <3.0.5.32.20050806181109.00f1fda8@mail.farreaches.org> <42F55657.6080700@mkproductions.org> <2hvf2hltle.f2h@mail.opusnet.com> Cc: Mark Kane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: After Partitioning a Drive: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRCerror (retrying request) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:50:37 -0000 I had a disk that was giving the same errors so at the time I just disabled DMA (in loader.conf, hw.ata.ata_dma=3D"0") but I still wanted to fix it.. so yesterday.. the drive was set as primary (ad2) but I switched it to slave (ad3).=20 it seems fine now. clayton On 8/7/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Mark Kane writes: >=20 > > This is a brand new motherboard. Giga-Byte GA-K8NS Pro. FreeBSD > > 5.4-RELEASE (amd64). > > > > I was also doing some searching around and found a list post about > > FreeBSD 5 and DMA write problems: >=20 > I've got a GA-K8NSC-939 running 5.4-R (i386) with two 80GB using > UDMA100 that I've run pretty hard occasionally with dump/restore, diff > -r kind of operations, with no problems. I ran 5.4-R (amd64) lightly > for a few days without noticing disk problems. >=20 > You said one of your disks was a slave. I've read rumors that that's > a bad thing if its master is a CDROM, but I'd think it should just > run slower than it's capable of. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 20:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FCA16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD40441C2 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:10:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by pooh.nagual.st with local; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:42:10 +0200 id 00000033.42F60FB2.000005B8 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:42:10 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050807134210.GA1459@pooh.nagual.st> References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:10:21 -0000 On 07 Aug dick hoogendijk wrote: > Is FreeBSD ready for running 24/7 a day in a *stable* way. > If yes, I'll upgrade my 4.11 server. This should of course be: "Is FreeBSD-5.4 ready ..." -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 20:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17F116A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABC3441A4 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:10:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by pooh.nagual.st with local; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:42:26 +0200 id 00000030.42F65612.000002DE Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:42:26 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050807184226.GA726@pooh.nagual.st> References: <20050807144713.GB2057@lothlorien.nagual.st> <002101c59b60$24cdcd00$9800000a@jara2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002101c59b60$24cdcd00$9800000a@jara2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:10:21 -0000 On 07 Aug Jack Raats wrote: > Never change a winning team! Why would you upgrade if everything is > running smooth and stable? Like I said, maintainance on two different releases is more work than just for one. Upgrading ports / world etc.. But like you said: it sure is a winning team ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 20:24:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B47716A426 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1725843DC3 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so895883wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kw9+6CxZ0F085KU0YSXX9da9nH2dO2eP0aDMRv5QTx6nWhXonuN5ys42GWmpuLTDdIgIOYkHFqVIzsPNFGLFUGLrLaHbergV4AVGygBzzgt7xoOKQ6Rt/olPCz9/0N8PRTAkh8Z4nAJ1mSRCJZSKPgtus7ICWxEyb0sTztk3UnY= Received: by 10.54.36.64 with SMTP id j64mr4346046wrj; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.51.38 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c816878050807125150d3cf99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:51:05 +0100 From: Kep Woof To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Epson Stylus C86 and apsfilter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:24:04 -0000 Hi, i needed a printer so i checked linuxprinting.org and thought an epson c86 would be a good idea. i'm trying to set it up using usb. now i've googled off and on for a few days now, and seen that people have strong opinions as to whether they use CUPS or not. i tried a few printcap recipies that i wasn't sure how to use, and after more reading saw that the recommended driver for my printer was gimp-print. ideally i'd like something simple, that i can later use with samba, so i was thinking along the lines of lpr or lprng. so more fiddling, and i've got apsfilter and ghostscript-gnu-nox11 installed, and choose the closest driver from the nice apsfilter menu - epson stylus c80. i fill in the other details, and it seems fine - /dev/ulpt0 & a4 - but when i try the test page i get lines of text on the paper as follows: < X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A7A16A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeansen@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA8643F39 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeansen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so925268wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ptio77DHZYsJ4VPxMmPSX5Jc9KidDoFdQThJte9jxyUdehFc861ksDdLN+6/LFUrUSUtFlU1vkPx1AFFMdL1HB/KS1PHob+nqJV7xlfeXwJtRJoXqTkD54NotbCGBrcXvoUBjxqrQGdOLti2gSGRzFALptgXaKLHLd4zIh8sCG0= Received: by 10.54.4.8 with SMTP id 8mr4430121wrd; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from VM-WORK ([80.133.204.100]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 13sm7031608wrl.2005.08.07.14.00.02; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:00:31 +0200 From: Marcel Lautenbach X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.30) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <418638850.20050807230031@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <42F63434.8050603@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <251025804.20050807175623@gmail.com> <42F63434.8050603@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error installing some ports after fress system-install - bsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcel Lautenbach List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:00:05 -0000 Guten Tag Bj=F6rn K=F6nig, am Sonntag, 7. August 2005 um 18:17 schrieben Sie: > Marcel Lautenbach wrote: >> [...] >> So, first I've installed bsd the standard way. After installing >> I went back the the post-configuration. >> Then I tried installing some ports for kde and gnome. For the >> ease of installing I just seleced the meta-ports. I also selected >> some editors. (emacs and vim) >> Well, and that's it. I clicked "Install". >> But, after some ports sysinstall came up with an error that said: >>=20 >> Add of package shared-mime-info-0-15_9 abortet, error code 1 - >> Please check the debug screen for mor info. >>=20 >> and the debug screen said: >> tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or= format >> pkg_add: tar extract of - failed! >> pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from '-' not a package? >> [...] > I never did it this way, i.e. with sysinstall. I heard from other users > that this often causes errors. Install additional packages as described > in the handbook chapter 4 and 5. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ > Regards Bj=F6rn hi bj=F6rn, thanks for your answer. well, so far i have done several installtations (from 4.8 to 4.11 and 5.2 to 5.4) but this is the first time i am experiencing these problems. well, i will try it by hand then. thanks for your help. --=20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Marcel Lautenbach mailto:jeansen@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 21:13:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1C416A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: from web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 157AF43F37 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 62117 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Aug 2005 21:13:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QHxb66QBAD4MfIt8XagZommhXd2M/QEbjLJAyIxBxb2S5am8TUDT6YXRnvEDMUy6iffkU4MrNnbywcasbU1fF9Dbq9+UkLlkhVrqsd7cZauoj5zFv9JNQqHvDA4paSNu30fqkY0PS2r+kn9RyeOKzQTU7hePB/GX54qIWcdBE9U= ; Message-ID: <20050807211325.62115.qmail@web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.216.129.249] by web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:13:25 PDT Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:13:25 -0700 (PDT) From: steve lasiter To: free bsd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: gateway configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:13:26 -0000 I am researching and accumulating information on setting up my small office network and using a FreeBSD Gateway/Firewall as my entry point. I am seeking general FreeBSD advise, know problems, and input on this topic. I currently have all the equipment up and configured and now I'm tying it all together. The computer I will be setting up as the the Gateway has FreeBSD 5.4 and is a PII 400MHz with 256MB Ram and 9 Gig HDD. I plan on putting two new ethernet cards in to ensure quality. Any advice on whether this seems sufficient if this machine is only serving as a Gateway. I understand a lot will depend on my rules and traffic so I may up the ram, or get another pc for it based on advice received here. Also, should I put a gigabit Ethernet card in my Gateway?-see below topic. I recently bought two new Dual Pentium 1.2GHz with SCSI's and both have gigabit ethernet ports along with the standard ethernet ports. I have the SMP Kenel configured and the boxes ready to go as a mail/web/database server and the other as a streaming video/ftp server. I have six boxes total and will be adding more. What is going to be the best way to take advantage of the gigabit ethernet ports on the big dual boxes? I read that FreeBSD had some issues with the gigabit ethernets earlier, are there still outstanding issues? Should I upgrade the other PC's to gigabit ethernet cards in order to take advantage of this or should I buy a switch with both port types and just mix and match? I'm sure one of you out there has worked these issue at some point and I need the usual expert advice I have consistently received from you guys. Thanks in advance, Dean Lasiter ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 21:38:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE5B16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:38:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDD543D5C for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:38:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77Lchna028164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:38:44 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050807142409.0f1a5ba0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:39:12 -0700 To: steve lasiter , free bsd From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050807211325.62115.qmail@web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050807211325.62115.qmail@web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: gateway configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:38:45 -0000 At 02:13 PM 8/7/2005, steve lasiter wrote: >I am researching and accumulating information on >setting up my small office network and using a FreeBSD >Gateway/Firewall as my entry point. I am seeking >general FreeBSD advise, know problems, and input on >this topic. I currently have all the equipment up and >configured and now I'm tying it all together. > >The computer I will be setting up as the the Gateway >has FreeBSD 5.4 and is a PII 400MHz with 256MB Ram and >9 Gig HDD. I plan on putting two new ethernet cards in >to ensure quality. Any advice on whether this seems >sufficient if this machine is only serving as a >Gateway. I understand a lot will depend on my rules >and traffic so I may up the ram, or get another pc for >it based on advice received here. Also, should I put a >gigabit Ethernet card in my Gateway?-see below topic. Having gigabit ethernet on your gateway/firewall is a bit of waste. Unless of course you have a gigabit link to the internet. >I recently bought two new Dual Pentium 1.2GHz with >SCSI's and both have gigabit ethernet ports along with >the standard ethernet ports. I have the SMP Kenel >configured and the boxes ready to go as a >mail/web/database server and the other as a streaming >video/ftp server. I have six boxes total and will be >adding more. What is going to be the best way to take >advantage of the gigabit ethernet ports on the big >dual boxes? Assuming those machines are primarily used to provide services across the internet, gigabit ethernet doesn't do you any good. If you're planning on moving a lot of data around locally, then gigabit would certainly make things faster. >I read that FreeBSD had some issues with >the gigabit ethernets earlier, are there still >outstanding issues? I've used some of the Intel gigabit cards without any problems. Don't know if others have problems or not. >Should I upgrade the other PC's to >gigabit ethernet cards in order to take advantage of >this or should I buy a switch with both port types and >just mix and match? Same as above. Moving lots of data locally would benefit from that, otherwise just use what the machines have now. -Glenn >I'm sure one of you out there has worked these issue >at some point and I need the usual expert advice I >have consistently received from you guys. > >Thanks in advance, > >Dean Lasiter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 22:32:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41B816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:32:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2965543F38 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:32:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C3737D for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:32:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28348-02 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:32:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.23] (mini.intranet [10.0.0.23]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26C015B for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:32:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F68C05.1000404@datacomm.ch> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:32:37 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20050806221350.C2146@fw.skeleton.org> In-Reply-To: <20050806221350.C2146@fw.skeleton.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA78DBAA9C80E3EA355F40DD9" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Cc: Subject: Re: telnet/sshd limited by user? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:32:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA78DBAA9C80E3EA355F40DD9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Is it possible to set things so that 'telnet' is allowed only to one > specific user, while everyone else needs sshd? ie: Obviously, nologin > can be used as a shell to not permit any logins (but makes 'su' break > too), but I'd like to allow telnet for one specific user only and keep > everyone else on sshd. Yes, by playing with PAM. You can change telnetd's PAM configuration (/etc/pam.d/telnetd) to include a group check: auth requisite pam_group.so no_warn group=telnetusers Then create a group "telnetusers", and make your telnet user a member of it. Haven't tested it myself, hope it works. Cheers Benjamin --------------enigA78DBAA9C80E3EA355F40DD9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC9owFgShs4qbRdeQRApapAJwNbWG8vH2Q2oUZ0L1CGLI2O4XesACfarjy NhuHJb2DJpmILuMHIsSj7Iw= =C4JQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA78DBAA9C80E3EA355F40DD9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 22:36:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D76A16A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:36:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from amail1.space2u.com (amail1.space2u.com [62.20.1.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D33A43F4D for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:36:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from localhost (www-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.180]) by amail1.space2u.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77Ma7X2024607; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:36:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:36:07 +0200 Message-Id: <200508072236.j77Ma7X2024607@amail1.space2u.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Joachim Dagerot" To: Nikolas Britton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RocketRaid 454 in FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:36:13 -0000 On 2005-08-07 Nikolas Britton wrote: On 8/7/05, Joachim Dagerot wrote: >> >> My freeBSD 5.3 system supports HighPoint RocketRaid 454 flawless, using Highpoints own driver. >> >> The freeBSD 5.4 panics if I load Highpoints driver (marked for version 5.3) and without loading it it simply doesn't identify it as a single unit. >> > >Does it show up as da0? when the driver is loaded or device ar0? Yes, but it's not identified as one single device. Only as eight individual disks. Seems I will go back to version 5.3 of freeBSD. Thanks for your help! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 22:54:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD5816A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:54:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F2943D55 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:54:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 72472 invoked by uid 1008); 7 Aug 2005 22:55:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 22:55:08 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net); by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:55:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53009.24.90.33.115.1123455308.squirrel@24.90.33.115> In-Reply-To: <20050807120441.Y64769@wonkity.com> References: <62869.24.90.33.115.1123362653.squirrel@24.90.33.115> <20050806195118.O39557@zoraida.natserv.net> <1901.24.239.176.131.1123404300.squirrel@24.239.176.131> <20050807102048.N48843@zoraida.natserv.net> <3376.24.239.176.131.1123427437.squirrel@24.239.176.131> <20050807120441.Y64769@wonkity.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:55:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Warren Block" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: francisco@natserv.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAED_DMA timed out crap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:54:56 -0000 good advices... didn't know about the atacontrol.... thank you all... > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, kalin mintchev wrote: > >> can i just hook up a laptop hdd in a desktop machine? > > Yes, with a 40-to-44-pin IDE adapter. The pins on a 2.5-inch laptop > drive are spaced closer together than on a 3.5-inch drive. > > Before doing that, though, it's worth downloading a copy of the FreeSBIE > CD and booting with that: > > http://www.freesbie.org/ > > Even if you can't mount the hard drive, you at least ought to be able to > dd data from it. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 23:44:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986C616A468 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:43:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from mail1.dm.egate.net (mail1.dm.egate.net [216.235.1.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E36543E17 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from fw.skeleton.org (h216-235-8-78.host.egate.net [216.235.8.78]) by mail1.dm.egate.net (8.12.11/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j77NJi6c080269; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:19:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fw.skeleton.org (fw.skeleton.org [127.0.0.1]) by fw.skeleton.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77NJo4A023560; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:19:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) Received: from localhost (skeezix@localhost) by fw.skeleton.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j77NJoTR023557; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:19:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from skeezix@skeleton.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.skeleton.org: skeezix owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:19:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Mitchell To: Benjamin Lutz In-Reply-To: <42F68C05.1000404@datacomm.ch> Message-ID: <20050807191859.W2146@fw.skeleton.org> References: <20050806221350.C2146@fw.skeleton.org> <42F68C05.1000404@datacomm.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: telnet/sshd limited by user? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:44:01 -0000 On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Benjamin Lutz wrote: # > Is it possible to set things so that 'telnet' is allowed only to one # > specific user, while everyone else needs sshd? ie: Obviously, nologin # > can be used as a shell to not permit any logins (but makes 'su' break # > too), but I'd like to allow telnet for one specific user only and keep # > everyone else on sshd. # # Yes, by playing with PAM. You can change telnetd's PAM configuration # (/etc/pam.d/telnetd) to include a group check: # # auth requisite pam_group.so no_warn group=telnetusers # # Then create a group "telnetusers", and make your telnet user a member of it. # # Haven't tested it myself, hope it works. Ah, indeed; I didn't read much up on PAM and didn't realize it could go through a series of phases before allowing on, so you can do a group-check and then additional checks as well. Neat stuff. Thanks for the tip, jeff -- "Have you played Atari today?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 01:07:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FCA16A436 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:07:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from runfreebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web52513.mail.yahoo.com (web52513.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7693A43DE6 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:41:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from runfreebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 94327 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Aug 2005 00:41:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HYaBB7HPqcqQ1FEMhLE29oLTndRD0VMZ2Qk73jQbb9CIfBUlxBdR43/polKsUzSlmqQkt3nWSIrNyGGQsVPxPKsjSY62mh2nsBWVp73mz1BRjDEKgm7tsjugw+Kvezpp6j11CJmXFs7IpS34hRt7t5nl3Iocf1i0hh4qsLzHNqM= ; Message-ID: <20050808004123.94325.qmail@web52513.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.204.157.14] by web52513.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:41:23 PDT Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:41:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: gaim or aim on 5.4 amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:07:19 -0000 Hello Family, I'm trying to get either GAIM or AIM to work on my 5.4 "amd64" to no avail. It works on my 5.4 "i386" and I was wondering if anyone can help, here is my "ports" failure message for GAIM. AIM reports only being ported to i386. ##################### [root@liam /usr/ports/net/gaim]-> make install clean ===> gaim-1.2.1 has known vulnerabilities: => gaim -- Yahoo! remote crash vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- MSN Remote DoS vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- MSN remote DoS vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- remote crash on some protocols. Reference: => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/gaim. ##################### Thanks in advance. ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 01:15:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D991716A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFF143D45 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B99499791E; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 03:15:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 45604-02; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 03:15:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74610997472; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 03:15:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F6B222.1030604@t-hosting.hu> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 03:15:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Schoolcraft References: <20050808004123.94325.qmail@web52513.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050808004123.94325.qmail@web52513.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: t