Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:30:46 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: qjail1 <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port maintainer address Message-ID: <20160208063046.GV46096@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <56B80099.3070606@a1poweruser.com> References: <56B56114.1000401@a1poweruser.com> <20160206063406.GP46096@home.opsec.eu> <56B80099.3070606@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I ask WHY is the > Freebsd ports system using a very old methodology that was designed over > 20 years ago, before the birth of spam. There was spam, even more than 20 years ago. > The majority of customer > websites and programming development websites all have protected their > user email addresses, WHY NOT FREEBSD? Maybe because it's not a big problem in general ? It's annoying etc, but not a big problem ? > It's way past the time that this problem gets the attention it deserves. If you have code and ideas on how to handle this, put in a problem report in bugs.freebsd.org. If some activist can be found to fight this cause, it will probably be solved. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160208063046.GV46096>