Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:53:35 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>, FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: OS/2 users going to FreeBSD? :-) Message-ID: <22124.867254015@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:41:59 BST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.970625163951.6337A-100000@dylan.visint.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I think it's the paid part which does it. Happily, I'm now > > interviewing for a paid writer's position now so that this component > > of the problem can be dealt with. > > Actually I was expecting someone to flame me for saying that M$ Windows > has better docs than FreeBSD, which isn't entirely true but... Actually, if our kernel was documented even half as well as NTs, we'd be total gods. Just because Microsoft does a lot of things wrong doesn't mean it does _everything_ wrong (and before 50 people all chime in about how NT's docs are definitely deficient in areas B, C and D, bear in mind that I'm talking about _comparative_ magnitude - NTs docs may leave you high and dry in some areas, but ours leave you wondering why you even bought a boat in the first place :-). > Eagerly awating documentation... ;) Hope (s)he's good. I'll be interviewing (s)he today [well, multiple (s)hes], so we'll just have to see. ;-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22124.867254015>