From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Dec  8 12:31:05 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA22848
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:31:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA22835
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by solar.tlk.com 
	id <m0vWps7-000IE3C@solar.tlk.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 96 21:30 MET
Message-Id: <m0vWps7-000IE3C@solar.tlk.com>
From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum)
Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ?
In-Reply-To: <199612081725.SAA17856@klemm.gtn.com> from Andreas Klemm at "Dec 8, 96 06:25:18 pm"
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:30:47 +0100 (MET)
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Reply-To: torstenb@pegasus.tlk.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Andreas Klemm wrote:

> > > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last
> > > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks.
> > 
> > I would do that, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to upgrade it
> > before the 2.2-RELEASE is out.
> > 
> > Comments ?
> 
> I think the inn ports should move this way:
> 
> 	inn		-> inn-1.5
> 	inn-current	-> inn-unoff4
> 
> So people have a stable hacked up inn rel 1.4-unoff4 and the new inn
> to make experiments with it.

I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port
before 2.2-RELEASE is out ?
inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on.

 -tb