From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul  9 23:05:18 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA26396
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 23:05:18 -0700
Received: from casparc.ppp.net (casparc.ppp.net [194.64.12.35])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA26390
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 23:05:15 -0700
Received: from ernie by casparc.ppp.net with uucp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sVBus-000HzkC; Mon, 10 Jul 95 08:02 MET DST
Received: by ernie.altona.hamburg.com (Smail3.1.29.0 #15)
	id m0sVBJ6-000208C; Mon, 10 Jul 95 07:23 WET DST
Message-Id: <m0sVBJ6-000208C@ernie.altona.hamburg.com>
From: hm@ernie.altona.hamburg.com (Hellmuth Michaelis)
Subject: Re: pcvt Doc/INSTALL.FreeBSD-2.0
To: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph P. Kukulies)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 07:23:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
In-Reply-To: <199507090959.LAA00724@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph P. Kukulies" at Jul 9, 95 11:59:45 am
Reply-To: hm@altona.hamburg.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 609       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>From the keyboard of Christoph P. Kukulies:

> The suggested patch in pcvt Doc/INSTALL.FreeBSD-2.0 seems to be superfluous
> in -current since it seems to be already there.

That is correct, it is only needed for 2.0.

> What is the options line for PCVT_FREEBSD=? I see conditional code
> testing for PCVT_FREEBSD > 205 in the source, so should I use
> 210 as a value?

For 2.0.5, you need to use the value 210, why ? Ask Joerg :-)))

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis           hm@altona.hamburg.com              Hamburg, Europe
                                              (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nstall BSD ?