From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 19 16:00:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA14919 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from junior.apnpc.com.au (junior.apnpc.com.au [203.12.233.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA14902 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:00:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cheese@apnpc.com.au) Received: from zen.apnpc.com.au (zen.apnpc.com.au [203.12.233.17]) by junior.apnpc.com.au (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA27632 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:45:00 GMT Received: from gremlin2 (unverified [203.12.233.30]) by zen.apnpc.com.au (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:53:01 +1100 Message-ID: Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Mark Cheeseman" Organization: APN Computing Group Pty Ltd To: Julian Elischer Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:47:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Default router not on network CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.42) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk OK, I'll try. ASCII graphics aren't my strong point :-) They are perfectly legal IP addresses, and they're already advertising them. But the boxes are on an Ethernet shared with another subnet. The router's IP address comes from that subnet, and they can't/won't put an alias on the router port from our network. ---------+---------+-----------+--------- | | +--X.X.X.20 | +-----Y.Y.Y.5 X.X.X.1 | The Net... X.X.X.1 is the router on the other network. X.X.X.20 is another machine on that network. Y.Y.Y.5 is one of my boxes that I'm being told needs to route to X.X.X.1 (where X!=Y). Both are class C networks. The router is advertising both class C's to the net. Does that help any? > draw a picture of what you want. > it makes it clearer. > > do they want to use address translation? > I'm not sure I understand the problem. > > > They are basically being lazy, assuming you have legal address numbers, > theyjust don't want to have to advertise your addresses. > > Steve Hovey wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Mark Cheeseman wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to get a couple of FreeBSD boxes running at an ISP, who > > > wants us to use an address not in our class C as the default route. > > > FreeBSD doesn't seem to want to know about this. The ISP is adamant > > > that they can't put an alias from our address block on their router, > > > and adds words to the effect of "it works for Linux". > > > > If it works for linux, then linux is broken. Unless they will give you an > > IP in the subnet their router is in - in which case you can set an alias. > > > > Also - how do they think that they can route back to you otherwise? > > > > > > > > How can I convince FreeBSD (2.1.7, btw) to route through such an > > > address? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mark > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Cheeseman, Manager, APN Online cheese@apnpc.com.au Tel +61 2 9936 8680 > > > http://www.zdnet.com.au/ http://www.gamespot.com.au/ Fax +61 2 9955 8871 > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Steve Hovey > > Chief Engineer > > BuffNET More Than Just a Connection! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Mark Cheeseman, Manager, APN Online cheese@apnpc.com.au Tel +61 2 9936 8680 http://www.zdnet.com.au/ http://www.gamespot.com.au/ Fax +61 2 9955 8871