Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:06:35 -0600 From: "Mike Loiterman" <mike@ascendency.net> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Ports upgrade policy Message-ID: <015601c6473e$36e5c490$0501a8c0@Mike8500>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is my supfile: *default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_6_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. ports-all doc-all I have been using it like this for years, obviously changing to the latest release tag. I haven't had problem and I'm not having problems, but my question is this: Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for ports? Typically, I upgade my ports a few days after they get updated so I'm always running the latest version, but would it be better to sync both ports and source to RELEASE? Obviously, it depends, somewhat, on personal choice, but in terms of stablity and "correctness" which is better? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?015601c6473e$36e5c490$0501a8c0>