Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 22:47:02 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: jlemon@americantv.com (Jonathan Lemon) Cc: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), alex@androcles.com (Duane H. Hesser), cat@uunet.ca, chat@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: UU.NET, SPAM, and Cyberpromotions (was Re: usregsite.com) Message-ID: <19970523224702.NL51483@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <19970523141845.49335@right.PCS>; from Jonathan Lemon on May 23, 1997 14:18:45 -0500 References: <XFMail.970522205148.alex@androcles.com> <199705231636.JAA07391@phaeton.artisoft.com> <19970523141845.49335@right.PCS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Moved to -chat) As Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > I did report it, and haven't seen anything since after the second time > > I had to report it to them; I got their canned response, so it may be > > that they have taken care of this one. > > The problem with uu.net is that they lease their dialups to various > ISPs, but there's no way to discover this from the information that > uu.net provides. > The annoyed victim complains to uu.net, ... Well, but uu.net is in charge for this entire domain, and as long as they don't even install MXes for their subdomains, so you could complain e.g. at postmaster@foo.bar.ca.uu.net, i can't feel with them. I've tried a few times to resolve MXes for the lower-level uu.net subdomains, but it really looks the first level you could send mail to again is uu.net itself. So they have to bear the complaints then. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970523224702.NL51483>