Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 17:32:20 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: chad@dcfinc.com Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), rkw@dataplex.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <199711210032.RAA12161@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711210028.RAA04371@freebie.dcfinc.com> References: <199711202321.QAA11798@mt.sri.com> <199711210028.RAA04371@freebie.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > It has to be done by CVS; each commit increments a counter. This means > > > that simultaneous commits become impossible, as the object containing > > > the counter has to be locked as part of the commit. > > > > This file then increases w/out bounds, which is unacceptable. > > No, think a bit larger. Make newvers.sh have a keyword (like %%date%%) > that a sed script could use to replace the "counter" as a part of a > commit. Only do the RCS/CVS drill on newvers.sh if something =other > than= the date string changes. And where does this counter number come from? We're back at the same place we started. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711210032.RAA12161>