From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 22:05:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC01F16A47C; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEC743E22; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:04:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net ([12.207.12.9]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20061102220439m9100elbd2e>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:04:40 +0000 Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA2M4cXR077198; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:04:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kA2M4bso077197; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:04:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:04:37 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20061102220437.GD74928@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Maxim Sobolev , current@FreeBSD.org, Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:05:48 -0000 --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:41:57AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > > >again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > > >"to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > > >of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > > >is turned on by default. > >=20 > > No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that=20 > > nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that br= anch. > >=20 > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Does that rule still matter since the new rule with symbol versioning will be that we don't bump them. Period. (at least for libraries we control)? -- Brooks --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFSmt0XY6L6fI4GtQRAl9nAJ9G/xGMS6O5I49t3VgHvooQ9CvtLQCgh58F zQEbFp+ymU6m6gUZRrynRzY= =Bnwc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A--