Date: Sat, 09 Dec 1995 11:09:35 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey), hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: Who's working on ISDN? Message-ID: <5661.818536175@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Dec 1995 19:21:00 %2B0100." <199512091821.TAA02565@allegro.lemis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The real story is that some Central Offices in the U.S. are able to offer real 64K B channels and some can't, especially if the endpoints span multiple COs. It doesn't appear to have anything to do with the switch (I know people running real, measured, 64K speeds on both the AT&T 5ESS and NT DMS-100 switches) and would appear to be more of a factor involving trunk bandwidth between COs. A friend at Cisco just got bumped from 56K to 64K as a result of some PacBell upgrade, and he's a considerable distance away from the Cisco side, so evidently the problem is being dealt with (at least in the S.F. Bay Area) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5661.818536175>