Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:55:24 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, ?d?m Szilveszter <adamsz@mailpont.hu> Subject: Re: fetch extension - use local filename from content-disposition header Message-ID: <20051230205523.GN11200@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <200512300845.55681.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20051229193328.A13367@cons.org> <86irt7dk5k.fsf@xps.des.no> <43B4FFB2.4090203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200512300845.55681.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 08:45:53AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Yeah, I have a src:src user group that I make own /usr/src and /usr/ports and > make them group writable. I have the chown/chmod in a script I run to run > cvs update on /usr/src and /usr/ports even. I just stick myself in the src > group and then I can build ports as myself and let it use su for the install > and config steps. This is exactly what I do as well. I might be missing a reason that this is not 'standardized' (a.k.a. in the base system). --Stijn -- It's harder to read code than to write it. -- Joel Spolsky, http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051230205523.GN11200>