Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 20:54:04 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: has anyone else seen this install error? Message-ID: <20040307045402.GA97795@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403062250280.503-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403062250280.503-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > This is something that someone has bound to have seen and > fixed already. It seems to be a difference in installs > that happened around 5.2, that affects the way the symlink > to the shared object library is done. (The port in this > example is devel/tcl-neo). >=20 > The port makefile and distfile are identical, but on > 4.9 it succeeds with: >=20 > ln -fs libneo82.so.1 /usr/local/lib/libneo82.so >=20 > and on 5.2 it fails with: >=20 > ln -fs /usr/local/lib/libneo82.so.1 /usr/lib/libneo82.so >=20 > (Note "/usr/lib", not "/usr/local/lib".) >=20 > Any hints? There were bsd.lib.mk changes that exposed brokenness in a lot of the tcl-related makefiles, which seem to have a common source. A number of others were fixed late last year, but I don't remember more details. Kris --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFASqrqWry0BWjoQKURAuTwAKCvI3kSo8VIyc9FSoB9Uryy/tmSfwCg8Ax/ UcRjkg2TUnWmv+ES+8NXQfw= =1ME/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040307045402.GA97795>