From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Jul 17 10:53:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (berserker.twistedbit.com [199.79.183.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0FE37BBA1
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cp@berserker.bsdi.com)
Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (cp@LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1])
	by berserker.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23382;
	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:42:38 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200007171742.LAA23382@berserker.bsdi.com>
To: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer)
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: removal of kvtop() on i386 
From: Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:42:38 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

}
}Uhm.  Is that support for removing kvtop(), against removing kvtop()
}or just a questions beside that topic?
}

No comment on the actual change. Its more of an
observation that this is changing something that is still
fundamentally broken.

}How do other *BSDs do that?
}
}Alex
}-- 

}...
}
}>How do other *BSDs do that?
}
}Bus DMA.
}
}--
}Justin
}

"Bus DMA" == abstracted out.

Chuck


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message