From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Jun 15 19:27:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10409
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA10404
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA07858;
	Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706160227.TAA07858@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Joel N. Weber II" <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: To UNIX or not to UNIX ;-). Was: PPP problems. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Jun 1997 21:26:15 EDT."
             <199706160126.VAA15617@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:27:01 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of "Joel N. Weber II" :
> At least, I know I like C, and I know I don't like perl.  But I'm
> inclined to agree with RMS's critcisms of TCL.
BTW: RMS was not even remotely rational in his criticism of TCL.
Basically, he was just pushing his own agenda and rather late at
that.

	Amancio