Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:15:40 +0400
From:      pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>
To:        "Ed Schouten" <ed@fxq.nl>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject:   Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk
Message-ID:  <a31046fc0708291215k560544c2kec8c1cea8f208ef@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070829190633.GD21190@hoeg.nl>
References:  <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <a31046fc0708291203s3e71d603ka7b34cc320a8166a@mail.gmail.com> <20070829190633.GD21190@hoeg.nl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 29/08/2007, Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> wrote:
> * pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > there will be no k9.
>
> I heard they stopped development, because it turned out to be dog slow.
>
> --
>  Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
>  WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
>
>

 yeap :).
As Giuseppe Amato, AMD's Technical Director for EMEA, said that
"There was a K9, but its performance was a bit of a dog" :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a31046fc0708291215k560544c2kec8c1cea8f208ef>