Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:13:54 -0500
From:      Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
>> Hi Ashkan,
>>
>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the 
>> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll 
>> go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be 
>> the differentiator.
> true. it is consistently slow.
>
> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.

There is no tale, only a feature set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features

>
>
>>
>> Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed.
>
> it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD.
>

Yes ! That's what actually ZFS do with SSD put the most used elements on it.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501EE212.3090403>