Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:50:15 +0100 
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nuno_C=E9sar_Pires?= <NCPires@isq.pt>
To:        'Matthew Seaman' <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Help to start BIND on boot
Message-ID:  <6A7539CE32D1CC42AD0B863337EEFCFB020B2101@isq004>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FYI

The problem was solved when I installed the FreeBSD 4.10 release and =
setup
BIND 8.3.7; everything is working just fine.

Thanks a lot Matthew,
Nuno=20


-----Original Message-----
From: Nuno C=E9sar Pires=20
Sent: ter=E7a-feira, 25 de Maio de 2004 10:20
To: 'Matthew Seaman'; Nuno C=E9sar Pires
Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
Subject: RE: Help to start BIND on boot

The problem is that this behaviour occurs also in a fresh installation
(4.9/8.3.6) in a different box (following the same installation =
checklist).

At this moment I'm considering to install and setup BIND 8.3.7 in the =
same
box that is running BIND 8.3.6 manually, i.e. not on boot. :-((

Thanks Matthew,
I will give you the feedback of this.
Nuno


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Seaman [mailto:m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk]=20
Sent: segunda-feira, 24 de Maio de 2004 14:09
To: Nuno C=E9sar Pires
Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: Help to start BIND on boot

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Nuno C=E9sar Pires wrote:

> My question is: what solve the problem, the new FreeBSD 5.2.1 or the =
BIND
> 8.3.7?

Good question.  It's unlikely to be the simple replacement of one OS
version or one BIND version for another -- we would know about it if
there was a general problem with people running BIND on FreeBSD. =20

> How can I solve this strange behaviour in the FreeBSD 4.9/BIND 8.3.6
system?

Unfortunately, having made my best guess, I'm afraid I'm all out of
suggestions.  Other than this: take a close look at the way both of
those boxes are set up, and try and isolate the differences in
configuration between the two.  The answer should lie somewhere in
there -- something you did differently on one of the boxes.  Isolate
that, and you're home and dry.

Which is easy to say, but not necessarily easy to do.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH =
UK
=20

CONFIDENCIALIDADE: Esta mensagem e quaisquer documentos em anexo s=E3o
confidenciais. Se n=E3o for o destinat=E1rio desta mensagem, =
agradecemos que
avise imediatamente o remetente e que a elimine sem a reproduzir, =
armazenar
ou divulgar a qualquer entidade.

CONFIDENTIALITY: This  e-mail  and  any attachments are confidential =
and may
be privileged. If  you are not a named recipient, please notify the =
sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it =
for
any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6A7539CE32D1CC42AD0B863337EEFCFB020B2101>