From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 15 16:00:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA27812 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 16:00:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail4.aracnet.com (mail4.aracnet.com [205.159.88.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA27787 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 16:00:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from beattie@aracnet.com) Received: from shell2.aracnet.com (IDENT:beattie@shell2.aracnet.com [205.159.88.20]) by mail4.aracnet.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA07384; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 03:58:46 -0700 Received: from localhost by shell2.aracnet.com (8.8.7) id QAA12080; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 16:00:00 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 16:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Beattie To: Simon Shapiro cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we have a Y2K problem after all? (was 64-bit time_t) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Simon Shapiro wrote: > > On 15-Aug-98 Brian Beattie wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Simon Shapiro wrote: > > > >> Yup, we have... > >> > >> Create a file with date of 2017, theen ls -al it. ... > > Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks ok to me... > > Good news! You are right and I am wrong. I have a witness that, on > current, I was right a week or two ago. So what was it you were seeing? Brian Beattie | If my corporate life has taught me anything, beattie@aracnet.com | it was that running multi-million dollar www.aracnet.com/~beattie | projects in no way implied managerial competence. | Tony Porczyk ( in comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc ) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message