Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:12:05 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= <groudier@club-internet.fr> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha interrupt.c machdep.c mp_mac Message-ID: <200101112012.f0BKC5s37267@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:52:46 PST." <XFMail.010111115246.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I prefer "curproc" to PCPU_GET(curproc). Curproc already tells me >> that this variable must be per-cpu. > >How? Uhh. Because a current process spanning all CPUs makes no sense. >And does witness_spin_check tell you this, or astpending? astpending >wasn't even per-CPU before the first SMPng commit. How about common_tss? If I had reason to muck with those variables, I would have to already know. I don't believe that the constant reminder that something is per-cpu is required to write working code. Our developers are smarter than that. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101112012.f0BKC5s37267>