Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 19:03:36 -0600 From: "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Virtual memory question Message-ID: <3E20BEE8.61F8D9CD@imimic.com> References: <20030111224444.94D102A89E@canning.wemm.org> <200301112342.h0BNgj9a048596@apollo.backplane.com> <3E20B747.1FCA3B36@imimic.com> <200301120053.h0C0rBR1072243@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > ... > Except without the path rendezvous (which in sysv land may not even > represent a real filesystem path). I do not think we would want to > make this compatible with the brokekn SysV SHM API. It's just too > broken. shm_open(3) is for use with mmap(2). It really has nothing to do with System V SHM. Alan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E20BEE8.61F8D9CD>