From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 13:52:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5012BD76 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097E32829 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjqee-0003BA-6T for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:52:32 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:52:32 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Secure Boot" motherboards (to avoid)? Message-ID: <20140512135232.GA37905@potato.growveg.org> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5061.1399755000@server1.tristatelogic.com> <20140511230044.GA5591@potato.growveg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:52:47 -0000 On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Antoine Kallab wrote: > > You might want to look in to CoreBoot. It's a custom BIOS project. They > have a list of supported boards/chipsets on their wiki, and I do remember > seeing a lot of ASUS boards on the list. > > I can't vouch for it in any way, just thought it might be something worth > trying if you can't get your bios to behave. Thanks for the suggestion. I've had a look at their wiki, unfortunately mine isn't supported. -- John