From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 15:09:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3AE1065670 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391B08FC18 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D73D23C64 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:09:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A72D23C5F for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:09:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usbctlt011.secnap.com (10.70.2.19) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:09:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD0C431.6080904@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:09:37 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20120607140507.GU25456@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120607140507.GU25456@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [simon@freebsd.org: Re: anoncvs.. offer] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:09:39 -0000 not on hubs@... so. On 6/7/12 10:05 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > Hmm, you guys use pie charts in network monitoring?;-) learned years ago, when the 'color' terminals came out (we really only need green screen), that there is a difference between what the soc engineers need, and what the customers want to see. clients are not all that bright.. if they don't see pretty pie charts, they don't know its running. If we really explained how we did, what we did, and why we did it, they would not purchase. I am NOT running a cvs or svn mirror right now. The only official mirror I run is for SpamAssassin (SpamAssassin spam code signatures). I am one of three official mirrors. we would NOT put it in our 'corporate' network, or block of ip addresses (people always try to hack security companies.. especially if they see we use pie charts). But a totally separate network. Our internal people would not even have access to this. Access controls would be totally up to you. (as long as they meet our minimum controls), As for ssh, whatever, you just tell me what you need, is it ok to put this in a 7.4 AMD64 jail? or would you feel more comfortable with a dedicated machine? and as for cvs vs svn, my original need was to anoncvs to help a potential ports committer learn cvs, but, we are moving ports to svn anyway. Doesn't matter, if you need a anoncvs.us.freebsd.org, let me know specifications and requirements, I'll set up what needs to be set up . -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell