Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 06:25:20 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> Cc: virtualization@FreeBSD.org, jail@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New jail framework - the userland side Message-ID: <4424.1241418320@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 May 2009 20:31:35 CST." <49FE5387.3020503@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <49FE5387.3020503@FreeBSD.org>, Jamie Gritton writes: >Hi all. I recently added some new jail-related system calls to extend >the current jail system with an nmount-inspired name=value interface. I think this is a great move in the right direction, my only concern is that we should try to share as much of the string-munging code between the nmount and jail implementations as possible. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4424.1241418320>