From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 02:39:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu (mail.ki.iif.hu [193.6.222.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604543D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:39:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mohacsi@niif.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9110C563B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mignon.ki.iif.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mignon.ki.iif.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 56053-03-11 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D66315621; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mignon.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46F2561C for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:39:13 +0100 (CET) From: Mohacsi Janos X-X-Sender: mohacsi@mignon.ki.iif.hu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:39:28 -0000 Dear All, Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a certain port. Let's consider a following scenario: - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updated by the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port system and benefiting the regular update of the port? Best Regards, Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98