Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 21:14:16 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: stable@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: altq on tun0: queueing works, prioritization not? Message-ID: <20061001191416.GE1365@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <20061001181720.GD1365@roadrunner.q.local> References: <20061001181720.GD1365@roadrunner.q.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> This is definitely not what I would expect. Where is my error?
Oh well, I should have tried 'cbq' earlier. With the following settings
(renamed the queues)
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 800Kb queue { q_pri, q_std }
queue q_pri priority 6 cbq(borrow)
queue q_std priority 1 cbq(default borrow)
I'm actually able to achieve some effect. The upload is capped at
70-80kB/s and the download will fluctuate between 580 and 750 kB/s.
Much better than the plain priority queuing.
As soon as I cut the upload, the download will jump back to
950-1000kB/s.
Is this discrepancy (pri vs. cbq) known?
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061001191416.GE1365>