Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:15:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> To: "Anthony C. Chavez" <acc@anthonychavez.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DoD study Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0210301108190.6212-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> In-Reply-To: <20021030185817.GA8079@anthonychavez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Anthony C. Chavez wrote: > Specifically, Table 1 on page 15. There seems to be an inaccuracy or > two about the BSD license there. Which ones? I do see that it should have the "Original source can be incorporated into closed source products" property checked. > I'm wondering if this document, although slightly GPL-slanted, could be > used as ammo to show BSD's usage by the DoD. Any thoughts? Yes. Good advocacy. But I wonder what they are used for. Jeremy C. Reed http://www.reedmedia.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.43.0210301108190.6212-100000>