Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:18:15 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import Message-ID: <20040702191815.GM1034@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpk6xms6ve.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpd63eipfx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpk6xms6ve.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> writes: > > Any idea why I'm not seeing it? > > Because you're not building with -O2, like you should. I think DES forgot to say "for testing purposes." Also, why do we trust -O2 when there's still no assurance that the reason it's broken with ppp(8) is a ppp(8) C bug itself? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040702191815.GM1034>