Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 May 2013 10:24:03 +0200
From:      Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: in_pcblookup_local (?)
Message-ID:  <E1UYXlD-0001UR-N0@clue.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <CAGE5yCq3adNey0U1HDZxFY1dmeAu1H0QjeOoi5kYQdTzowKnmg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGE5yCq3adNey0U1HDZxFY1dmeAu1H0QjeOoi5kYQdTzowKnmg@mail.gmail.com> <201305021209.41221.jhb@freebsd.org> <52B3AEE5-D24A-4ED3-BB11-E7E27BFB447F@freebsd.org> <E1UXxhT-000MPI-Ju@clue.co.za> <201305021432.34456.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote:
> >> > offending revision.
> >>
> >> I've started a binary search.  I'll let you know what that turns up.
> >
> > Thanks, and sorry for getting my Ian's mixed up. :-/
> >
> > --
> > John Baldwin
> 
> There's been two separate machines, at least twice each on this exact
> panic / trace.  Always with doing a 'svn update'.
> 
> Rolling back to April 5th 249172 solves it.  (There's nothing
> particular about that rev, except it was top-of-tree when the last
> update was done).
> 
> I see a number locking changes in the area.  Note that this is UDP,
> most likely a dns lookup.

I'll work to confirm this here.  I was a little slow in bisecting
because I spent 2 days trying to figure out what revision caused
PF to rapidly expire its entire state table which prevented testing
this condition.

Ian

-- 
Ian Freislich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1UYXlD-0001UR-N0>