From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 16 2:45:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E7151E5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:45:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:45:54 -0800 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Greg Quinlan" , Subject: RE: Slapd (LDAP) Problems Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:45:54 -0800 Message-ID: <000001bf301f$c1c955a0$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <008101bf301d$3bbead40$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The distribution requirements for openldap are much more restrictive than those for the old ldap. I'd hate to see the more retricted one replace the freer one. DS > Thanks > > ALAN, THOMAS, ODDBJORN, HANS > > for your responses, end result: > > /usr/ports/net/ldap.............DOES NOT WORK! > > /usr/ports/net/openldap......WORKS WELL! > > So I think it would be in everyone's interest if the old 'ldap' > was deleted > from the ports directory, because as was clearly pointed-out it > is "old" and > been superseded by openldap!!! > > And in response to the question, why wasn't I using openldap, well, when I > went looking, I found "~/ldap". I thought "~/ldap" was LDAP, I > did not know > "openldap" was LDAP working/current/correct version, of course! > > Thanks Again > > > Greg > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message