Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:41:46 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: axl@iafrica.com, mike@smith.net.au Cc: bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr, dhw@whistle.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, meyerd1@fang.cs.sunyit.edu Subject: Re: NIS with HPUX 10.20 Message-ID: <199901271141.WAA14759@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Read the install(1) manpage, particularly the -C option. > >The question, though, is _why_ the need to use -C when installing >ld-elf.so.1? It's not flagged schg, from the looks of my box. So that ld-elf.so.1 can be installed safely on an active system. Plain install is braindamaged (doesn't give an atomic install) and we (ab)use `install -C' to get an atomic install. This has nothing to do with schg flagging except schg flagging prevents completely atomic installs. The missing schg is a bug if the schg for ld.so is not a bug. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901271141.WAA14759>