Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 09:29:37 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@dsuper.net> Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1 Message-ID: <3769.962609377@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 02:03:27 EDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007030136320.2431-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007030136320.2431-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>, Bosko Milekic writes: > I'm getting the unfortunate impression that evolution is being > frowned upon here. Are their other people that frown the proposal out > there to this extent? (i.e. "don't change it if it works") I'd like to > hear some important voices on this issue so that I can decide whether to > just drop this entire thing and forget about it. (in other words, what do > committers and/or core have to say about this?) If you can improve it, and show it to be improved, I think it is a good idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3769.962609377>