Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:54:27 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Svavar =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=FAthersson?= <admin@stuff.is> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Unicode-based FreeBSD Message-ID: <20080827115427.GA766@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <48B28B8D.9030305@kjarrval.is> References: <3cb459ed0808221700w335b0906g6901d8b8bec4dad9@mail.gmail.com> <200808241415.31812.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <6a7033710808241239p1cbdc7adwd4f87814b428b10b@mail.gmail.com> <3cb459ed0808241958v552eafejf7841f0f9993928e@mail.gmail.com> <48B28B8D.9030305@kjarrval.is>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:38:05AM +0000, Svavar Lúthersson wrote: > I suggest that the FreeBSD Foundation set a policy which states that > every new component must have Unicode support (if applicable) and > support projects to bring in Unicode support where there is none or > only partial. This indicates a misunderstanding of how the project works. The Foundation exists as a separate entity from the committers. Its responsibility is to hold the rights to the intellectual property and to do any legal work necessary. The codebase is technically the responsibility of the committers. There is a 'core team', elected by the committers, but its responsibility is more oriented towards mediating inter-committer problems and other related matters. So there is no single 'group' that could establish a rule like this. The way to get something like this instituted is to convince the bulk of the committers that it is a good idea. Summary: there is really no 'top-down' decision-making; all technical changes are driven from the bottom up. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080827115427.GA766>