Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:24:10 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Ryba <ryba@sylow.cs.qc.cuny.edu>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/ntfs ntfs_subr.c Message-ID: <47EEF9CA.9080008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803300219.m2U2JSjv016162@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200803300219.m2U2JSjv016162@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christian S.J. Peron wrote: > csjp 2008-03-30 02:19:27 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_7) > sys/fs/ntfs ntfs_subr.c > Log: > Un-break the build by adding a thread argument. This was removed in > -CURRENT but this change has not been MFCed yet. > > Submitted by: attilo > > Revision Changes Path > 1.42.2.2 +1 -1 src/sys/fs/ntfs/ntfs_subr.c I know this question should be else where but since the kernel ntfs doesn't allow for writting and fusefs-ntfs is stable why is ntfs still in the kernel and if it should be there why not replace it with fuse?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47EEF9CA.9080008>