Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:24:23 +0100
From:      Polytropon <>
To:        ajtiM <>
Subject:   Re: future of the desktop
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:09:58 -0600, ajtiM <> wrote:
> "Thanks to Solid's new UPower, UDev and UDisks backends, the deprecated HAL is 
> no longer needed to manage hardware on Linux. Applications do not need to be 
> updated to make use of these new backends. The HAL backend is still available 
> for systems that do not support UPower. "
> It happened with XFCE and now the same story with KDE. Is GNOME next?
> How looks like the future of desktop on FreeBSD or is time to install Linux 
> here?

Well, it's not that "desktop == Xfce || desktop == KDE". :-)
Maybe the Linux folks won't be happy with the U* either as
it will surely be depricated at the moment it fully works.

Regarding your question: I think it will be possible to keep
Xfce and KDE running, but they won't be in fully functional
state then. I'm not a KDE user (and not a Xfce user anymore),
so I can't be more specific.

Keep in mind that all the "magic" the U* are doing on Linux
have been done by FreeBSD's devd for many years now. Maybe
this is the chance to revert to a WORKING and STABLE infra-
structure on FreeBSD. Just remember: FreeBSD had "hotplug
capabilities" and "automounter" for many years, even BEFORE
HAL and DBUS came to desktop land.

Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>