Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:24:23 +0100
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: future of the desktop
Message-ID:  <20110127132423.cdb66a2a.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <201101270609.59227.lumiwa@gmail.com>
References:  <201101270609.59227.lumiwa@gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:09:58 -0600, ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Thanks to Solid's new UPower, UDev and UDisks backends, the deprecated HAL is 
> no longer needed to manage hardware on Linux. Applications do not need to be 
> updated to make use of these new backends. The HAL backend is still available 
> for systems that do not support UPower. "
> 
> It happened with XFCE and now the same story with KDE. Is GNOME next?
> How looks like the future of desktop on FreeBSD or is time to install Linux 
> here?

Well, it's not that "desktop == Xfce || desktop == KDE". :-)
Maybe the Linux folks won't be happy with the U* either as
it will surely be depricated at the moment it fully works.

Regarding your question: I think it will be possible to keep
Xfce and KDE running, but they won't be in fully functional
state then. I'm not a KDE user (and not a Xfce user anymore),
so I can't be more specific.

Keep in mind that all the "magic" the U* are doing on Linux
have been done by FreeBSD's devd for many years now. Maybe
this is the chance to revert to a WORKING and STABLE infra-
structure on FreeBSD. Just remember: FreeBSD had "hotplug
capabilities" and "automounter" for many years, even BEFORE
HAL and DBUS came to desktop land.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110127132423.cdb66a2a.freebsd>