Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:18:17 +0300
From:      Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.me>
To:        David Demelier <markand@malikania.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 12.0 end-of-life
Message-ID:  <565C8E52-00C6-47B2-B211-F573391D086B@yuripv.me>
In-Reply-To: <1d1cb3e8-ee64-41a7-ac5c-919d3985bd57@malikania.fr>
References:  <20200217231452.717FA1E820@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAFYkXjmZi1-MB6W0HsMx9gHek7Xg5heoSKKWkNTnw74dxRTwAw@mail.gmail.com> <ead08f6c-3dc4-210d-b321-549eb0ad721f@malikania.fr> <20200220154101.GA53326@ghostyhead.chthonixia.net> <1d1cb3e8-ee64-41a7-ac5c-919d3985bd57@malikania.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Feb 2020, at 19:36, David Demelier <markand@malikania.fr> wrote:
>=20
> Le 20/02/2020 =C3=A0 16:41, Joe A. a =C3=A9crit :
>> Desktop user since 1999, no sysadmining here. In fact, in 1999 Linux =
was
>> inestimably harder to use for a desktop than FreeBSD.
>=20
> Nice to hear, personally I'm unable to setup bluetooth (every =
hcccontrol request end in a timeout) nor I'm unable to use two finger =
scroll on my touchpad which literally work out of the box on Linux.
>=20
> I've used FreeBSD on my laptop a while back, it was a better =
experience. Using on a simple workstation is quite convenient though. =
But on laptop, it's huge nightmare (not mentioning ACPI).

It=E2=80=99s yet another thread that compares FreeBSD against Linux, and =
does mention =E2=80=9CACPI=E2=80=9D without any related information, so =
I simply *have* to ask =E2=80=94 ACPI what?=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?565C8E52-00C6-47B2-B211-F573391D086B>