From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 13:12:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05746106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B28FC13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu3u4-0000IL-93 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:12:16 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:12:16 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:12:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:12:20 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <4BA174B4.9010301@octopus.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <4BA174B4.9010301@octopus.com.au> Subject: Re: Choosing CPU for router X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:12:18 -0000 On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote: > > Jon Otterholm wrote: >> This machine is going to act as access-router serving ~500 >> FTTH-customers. >> About 500Mbit/s and 200kpps. The big issue is Dummynet, around 1000 >> pipes (2 >> pipes/customer). > > That doesn't sound right, 200kpps @ 500Mbps works out to an average > packet size of 250 bytes? Am I missing something Maybe he's pushing VoIP...