From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 09:55:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F158C106566C for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27D58FC20 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1456454ywe.13 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 02:55:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=iPAu4bhT8QasKE1JthjPdtHBpvB7aodcXgqlCZFPnsQ=; b=BQ2k8ASHm6A0ObcDKcuLN6m4bZB/nsap6p/fSqFm0QbWOdyweqw4P6J5IODrAhNkF6MXFV4V/yzQf3zrje3BCsBZ0B2MOsrOH++1jLwSELtsiXLyxVd1jrqhy/kuX3jV7/zoxy7vNRaATbz6izx7DLDOCPR9Wc1GYa5Md5iFRY4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=WStLWWhyMj78sZ8HR9S0NMDb9/dadH0vxml6mHuqVDpX38WfuLlAspIxxIkDyepp95Ai3YVlmKPwt77Rp5DdW0tzvj0S39Jzhd1L31eQmdWLbZZW1vZicimwrctUPWyqWt+o/Rw+5u2oJMZCo1Yl+AJzoMIJhenCzn8AsTEaLN8= Received: by 10.142.103.2 with SMTP id a2mr410647wfc.278.1211880506909; Tue, 27 May 2008 02:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [134.160.214.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm19872154wfg.9.2008.05.27.02.28.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 27 May 2008 02:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:27:34 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080527.182734.70210586.chat95@mac.com> To: aryeh.friedman@gmail.com From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <483BCABB.9000805@gmail.com> References: <200805270737.m4R7bVm8052516@repoman.freebsd.org> <483BCABB.9000805@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Maho NAKATA Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/files Makefile.others generate.pl patch-i80129 patch-i85027 patch-i85126 patch-i85127 patch-i85972 patch-i87583 patch-i88156 patch-i88160 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:27 -0000 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/files Makefile.others generate.pl patch-i80129 patch-i85027 patch-i85126 patch-i85127 patch-i85972 patch-i87583 patch-i88156 patch-i88160 ... Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 04:47:55 -0400 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Maho Nakata wrote: > | maho 2008-05-27 07:37:31 UTC > | > | FreeBSD ports repository > | > | Modified files: > | editors Makefile > | editors/openoffice.org-3 Makefile distinfo > | editors/openoffice.org-3/files Makefile.others generate.pl > | patch-i80129 patch-i85027 > | patch-i85126 patch-i85127 > | pkg-message.in > | Added files: > | editors/openoffice.org-3/files patch-i85972 patch-i87583 > | patch-i88156 patch-i88160 > | Log: > | Create openoffice.org-3 port. Repocopied from > | openoffice.org-2 port. Currently this is the > | beta version. Second beta will be July 1st 2008, and > | the final release will be September 2nd, 2008. > | http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease30 > > If this is not a final release shouldn't it be marked much more > specifically as such? Right, reasonable question. But creating openoffice.org-3-beta port or something like that is not good - even beta branch has its own milestones. We can consider such as release candidate of beta. so it is not constructive to have openoffice.org-3-beta beta-rc, 3, 3-RC. next beta will come, and then, I'll commit to RC. not creating beta-rc, etc. thanks, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/