Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:48:44 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>, Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>, yarodin@gmail.com, peter@vereshagin.org, gabor@freebsd.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20080111004844.GA80974@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080110223255.GA13357@heechee.tobez.org> References: <200712310028.lBV0S5On056424@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080110124041.GC80526@heechee.tobez.org> <20080110200027.GB73598@bsdcrew.de> <20080110214126.GA39859@FreeBSD.org> <20080110223255.GA13357@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:32:55PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:41:26PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:00:27PM +0100, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:40:41PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:28:05AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > Why this ever got added? There is an identical port > > > > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager. Now we are getting PRs with updates to this one > > > > (see 119300), where PR authors *complain* about someone updating "the wrong > > > > port", refering to gabor's update of www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager recently... > > > > > > > > What a mess. I'd like committers adding new ports to be a *bit* more > > > > careful and verify that the port is indeed *new*. > > > > > > > > It can be argued that the "new" name is better that the "old" one, but this > > > > is an entirely separate can of worm. Grrrr. > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > After a discussion with tobez on irc, we have made plans to remove > > > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager after the slush. The new Port make more > > > sense and have a Maintainer. > > > > As a side note: doesn't `FastCGI' look as a better name? We already > > have `www/p5-FastCGI' and `www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager', and only one > > `www/p5-FCGI-Async'. Maybe the latter should just be repocopied to > > match the former ones? > > The problem here is that the actual module on CPAN is named FCGI. > Gratuitously changing original name of software is something > that we are trying to avoid historically, even if the original > software breaks some other naming conventions by itself (a good > example here would be p5-CGI.pm, which is called "CGI.pm" on CPAN, > unlike the vast majority of CPAN content). > > In an ideal world, this would have been caught 3 years ago, and we would not > be having this conversation. Fair enough; in fact, I was suspecting something like this. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080111004844.GA80974>