From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 20:41:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A01316A4CE; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:41:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778243D1F; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.4.0.76] ([65.220.109.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8JKf3xr021633; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:41:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <414DEE9B.3020800@samsco.org> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:39:55 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" References: <20040919135233.4997ea78@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20040919135233.4997ea78@dolphin.local.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_MIXED_MODE X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:41:31 -0000 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:17:55 +0200, des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) > wrote: > > >>I just got an ASUS SK8N motherboard that has the problematic nForce 3 >>chipset. It runs 5.3 BETA4 fine, except you have to boot it in safe >>mode because the APIC only works properly in mixed mode, and GENERIC >>has the NO_MIXED_MODE option. Took me quite a while to figure that >>out... >> >>Should we consider removing that option for 5.3-RELEASE? > > > I'll second that motion. I have the same chipset, and the same problem > with NO_MIXED_MODE. I think we should err on the side of caution with > this one. > Let's see what Peter, David, and John say about this. My understanding is that mixed mode has a measurable performance impact, so we don't want to turn it on universally unless neccessary. Maybe David knows of a BIOS upgrade that would help your motherboards. Scott