From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 6 4:22:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5971337B403; Mon, 6 May 2002 04:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 7E538535E; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:22:12 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Doug Barton Cc: John Baldwin , Subject: Re: xdm broken on current References: <20020505230113.W4305-100000@master.gorean.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 06 May 2002 13:22:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020505230113.W4305-100000@master.gorean.org> Message-ID: Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton writes: > On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yep, these modules don't exist in -STABLE. You should keep your old > > /etc/pam.conf around for -STABLE programs. > I thought that pam ignored pam.conf if /etc/pam.d exists? -CURRENT's PAM does, -STABLE's doesn't. > Or are > you saying that I should make /etc/pam.d/xdm look just like the old > settings? I'm happy to test ideas to try and make this work, but I don't > really know anything about pam. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message