Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:01:57 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Brandon Weisz <lists@avioc.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring Message-ID: <AANLkTi=HypO06mTWSjmz2kxDUZQazBsXXXNPU35m5=y5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C94EEB2.3040008@avioc.org> References: <AANLkTikZUZ3%2BW%2Bikyiiw-L-X5v4t4EgTNF4vFf4w=oyK@mail.gmail.com> <4C94EEB2.3040008@avioc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 September 2010 00:54, Brandon Weisz <lists@avioc.org> wrote: >> I'd appreciate testing by AR5416/AR9160/AR9280/AR9285 users. I only >> currently have easy access to AR5416/AR9160. Please let me know >> immediately if something doesn't work with this which does work in >> -head. > > Are there plans for AR9287 support? =A0Unfortunately that is the only ath= card > I have to test with at the moment. At some point, yes. There's a lot of code missing in our driver for ar92xx series chips. I'd rather get the existing stuff updated and tidied up before I look at importing support for others. I'd also like to somehow acquire some hardware to test it against - I only have (very) legacy (pre AR5416), AR5416, AR9160 and AR2427 chips. I don't yet have anything with an AR9280/9285 in it. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=HypO06mTWSjmz2kxDUZQazBsXXXNPU35m5=y5>