Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:15:59 -0400
From:      Chris Brennan <>
Subject:   Re: Alternative windowmanagers
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060705060007040303010505"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8/5/2011 3:12 PM, Christian Barthel wrote:
> Hello,=20
> I read on slashdot that Linus Torvalds moved from Gnome 2.3x to Xfce. I=
> seems that he isn't thrilled by xfce, but it's far better than Gnome3. =

> As a Gnome 2.3x user too, I am also a bit nervouse. Gnome 3 is a big
> mistake. And there are also rumors that Gnome will be Linux only. Maybe=
> we will never see Gnome3 under FreeBSD, but this is not a tragedy :)
> I am not very interested in eyecandy: I want a stable and fast wm (less=

> memory and cpu, quick access to important places), different workspaces=
> and it should be configurable with ordinary files. Of course, It must
> run under FreeBSD.=20
> I sniffed into AfterStep, fvwm2 and fluxbox (I don't want to use KDE). =
> think, fluxbox is a nice wm and for my future, it will be the default w=
> for me. It's also very fast and easy to configure.=20
> Are there any other window manager worth looking?=20
> What is your window manager?=20

I'm usually a fluxbox fanatic, but lately, I've been messing with other
WM's just for the hell of it. Never was a fan of Gnome, 1.x or 2.x and
KDE was just fugly as all getout. But that's just my opinion :D. XFCE4
was always my second choice for a WM, slightly more feature rich but not
bloated like Gnome/KDE. If you want to wrastle (yes wrastle!) with
gnome-lite[3], that could be a possibility for you as well (it's lite
because it doesn't pull in *all* of the deps of a full gnome2 install
but you can accidentily pull them in by installing something else)

I'm a minimalist at heart, even when I have to use Windows, I prefer
EmergeDesktop[1] over the default windows shell. So that said, Fluxbox
has always fit the bill as to being as minimalistic yet extensible as I
needed it to be when I needed it to be. If your *seriously* hardcore,
you can check out ratpoison[2] (good luck on that <evilgrin>)

To be perfectly square about it, I honestly went and installed all kinds
of Window Managers, Gnome, KDE (yes I still do occasionally try new
releases), KFCE, fluxbox/openbox/blackbox as well as a few more obscure
and less/non-maintained WM's such as e17 and the ever fabled e18/e19
beta builds and yes, I even tried ratpoison (just keep in mind that the
last news even for it was Dec. of '09.

Good lucj on your quest for a WM and maybe ... document it for us,
others might learn something from your trials and tribulations.

[3] x11/gnome2-lite
> Chris Brennan
> --
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> | |
> GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8  9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C)


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>